Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Connolly, 930 So. 2d 951.

19 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Gerald Parker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
6/ 2/ 06), - 54 ( per curiam).
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
Mona C. Wilson v. St. Landry Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
6/2/06), wherein the supreme court stated it had not “required the disqualification of a judge solely on the basis of his or her coincidental employment in the District Attorney’s office at the time the defendant was charged in a case over which the judge had no supervision or control before assuming the bench.”
State Of Louisiana v. Calvin Williams La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
6/ 2/ 06), - 54 Qper cu ri am) .
State of Louisiana v. Marlon Frank Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Rules of Professional Responsibility, Rule 1.10(a).” State v. Connolly, 06-0540 (La.6/2/06), n. 1
State v. Thomas 217 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Singleton 216 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
f private law firms to effectuate a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of conflict-free counsel and the ethical obligation of an attorney associated with other lawyers in a firm to avoid representing a client when any one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so....’” Garcia , 09-1578, p. 38, 108 So.3d at 28 (quoting State v. Connolly, 06-0540 (La.6/2/06), n. 1 ); see also La.
State v. Wells 191 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Garcia, 09-1578, p. 38 (La.11/16/12), (citing State v. Connolly, 06-0540, p. 6, n. 1 (La.6/2/06), ; 954).
State v. Griffin 183 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
In State v. Connolly, 06-0540 (La.06/02/06), -55 , however, the Louisiana Supreme Court, citing People v. Julien, 47 P.3d 1194 (Colo.2002), stated that, in the absence of a showing of specific bias or prejudice, a trial judge “must disqualify himself sua sponte or in response to a motion to recuse only if facts exist tying the judge to personal knowledge of
State v. Tassin 129 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
Thus, given the guidelines set forth in State v. Connolly, 2006-0540 (La.6/2/06), , we see no error in the denial of relator’s motion for recusal.
State v. Garcia 108 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
Rules of Professional Responsibility, Rule 1.10(a).” State v. Connolly, 06-0540 (La.6/2/06), n. 1
State v. Kennedy 73 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the issue of whether a trial court judge must recuse himself in a case in State v. Connolly, 2006-0540, pp. 4-8 (La.6/2/06), -955 , in which the Court stated: |(iA trial judge must step down in any case in which he is “biased, prejudiced or personally interested in the cause to *989 such an extent that he would be unable to conduct a fair and impartial trial.” La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Stewart 65 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
13 .State v. Connolly, 06-540 (La.6/2/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Charles Gasaway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/2/06), See also State v. Mayeaux [sic], 06-944 (La.App.
State v. Gasaway 57 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Connolly, 06-540 (La.6/2/06), ; See also State v. Mayeaux [sic], 06-944 (La.App.
State v. Turner 50 So. 3d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The issue of whether a trial court judge must recuse in a case was addressed in State v. Connolly, 2006-0540, pp. 4-8 (La.6/2/06), -955 , in which the Court stated: A trial judge must step down in any case in which he is “biased, prejudiced or personally interested in the cause to such an extent that he would be unable to conduct a fair and impartial trial.” La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Wells 23 So. 3d 907 La. 2009
See State v. Connolly, 06-0540 p. 4 (La.6/2/06), (“[A]s a general matter, a trial judge may recuse himself from a case only when ‘a ground for recusation exists.’ ”) (quoting La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Robinson 22 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
This court's decision in Mills, supra, was cited with approval by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Connolly, 06-0540, p. 5 (La.6/2/06), , in which the court stated that it had not required a trial judge to recuse himself from a case "on grounds that he had previously prosecuted the defendant in a prior, unrelated case, and therefore might harbor some bias or prejudice against the defendant for that reason alone."
State v. Robinson 22 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
This court's decision in Mills, supra, was cited with approval by the Louisiana Supreme *1070 Court in State v. Connolly, 06-0540, p. 5 (La.6/2/06), , in which the court stated that it had not required a trial judge to recuse himself from a case "on grounds that he had previously prosecuted the defendant in a prior, unrelated case, and therefore might harbor some bias or prejudice against the defendant for that reason alone.” .