State Ex Rel. Roland v. State
State Ex Rel. Roland v. State, 937 So. 2d 846 (La. 2006).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana v. Edward R. Budd La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana Versus Cory W. Wall La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana Versus Arthur Williams, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana Versus Nicolva A. Harmon La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana Versus Howard Burl, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
- State v. Daniels 275 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- State v. Davis 269 So. 3d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- State v. Cooks 260 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Nelson 247 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Gumms 243 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Brown 239 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Raye 230 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. State 788 So. 2d 1199
Opinion text
937 So.2d 846 (2006) State ex rel. George Stanley ROLAND, III v. STATE of Louisiana. No. 2006-KH-0244. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 15, 2006. PER CURIAM. Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. Because R.S. 14:62.3(B) allows for parole eligibility, and R.S. 15:529.1(G) prohibits only "probation or suspension of sentence," the district court is directed to amend relator's sentence to delete the prohibition on parole. Cf., e.g., State ex rel. Turner v. State, 00-2034 (La.4/12/01), 788 So.2d 1199 . The district court is directed to make an entry in the minutes reflecting this change and the clerk of court is directed to transmit the original of the minute entry to officer in charge of the institution to which the defendant has been sentenced. La. C.Cr.P. art. 892(B)(2). In all other respects, the application is denied.