Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dick, 951 So. 2d 124.

61 citing documents.

State v. Collins 981 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Const. Art. IV, § 5(E); State v. Dick, 2006-2223 (La.1/26/07), .
Delta Chemical Corp. v. Lynch 979 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In State v. Dick, 06-2223 (La.1/26/07), , the Supreme Court recently set forth the law regarding statutory interpretation: The function of statutory interpretation and the construction to be given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.
State v. Fussell 974 So. 2d 1223 La. 2008
State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 12 (La.10/19/04), ; see also State v. Dick, 06-2223, p. 9 (La.1/26/07), .
City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUND 986 So. 2d 1 La. 2008
State v. Dick, 2006-2223, p. 9-10 (La.1/26/07), (emphasis added).
State v. Baker 970 So. 2d 948 La. 2008
E.g., State v. Dick, 06-2223, pp. 8-9 (La.1/26/07), .
Kinchen v. Livingston Parish Council 967 So. 2d 1137 La. 2007
This Court recently discussed the rules of statutory interpretation in the case of State v. Dick, 2006-2223 (La.1/26/07), : The function of statutory interpretation and the construction to be given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.
State v. LONZO 960 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
In State v. Dick, 06-2223 (La.1/26/07), , which is cited by defendant in her brief, the Louisiana Supreme Court recently set forth the law regarding statutory interpretation: The function of statutory interpretation and the construction to be given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.
State ex rel. Bush v. State 957 So. 2d 143 La. 2007
State ex rel. Ezeb v. State 957 So. 2d 145 La. 2007
State ex rel. Tell v. State 955 So. 2d 1272 La. 2007
State v. Triplett 952 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
12In State v. Dick, 06-2223, 06-2226 (La.1/26/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the exclusive remedy of an offender (such as Mr. Triplett) for relief under La.