Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Harper, 970 So. 2d 592.

18 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Marcel N. Dugar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
1 Cir. 9/5/07), writ denied, 07-1921 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Dkerian Thompson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
App. 1st Cir. 9/ 5107), writ denied, 2007- 1921 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Jerrell Alexander La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 1st Cir. 9/ 5/ 07), writ denied, 2007- 1921 ( La.
State v. Kitts 250 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1st Cir. 9/5/07), , 601, writ denied , 2007-1921 (La.
State v. Coleman 249 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1st Cir. 9/5/07), , 601, writ denied , 2007-1921 (La.
State ex rel. C.H. 183 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1 Cir. 9/5/07) , , writ denied, 2007-1921 (La.2/15/08), .
State v. Graham 148 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1st Cir.9/5/07), , writ denied, 07-1921 (La.2/15/08), .
State v. Dahlem 148 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1st Cir.9/5/07), , writ denied, 2007-1921 (La.2/15/08), .
State v. Cobb 144 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1 Cir. 9/5/07) , , writ denied, 07-1921 (La.2/15/08), .
State v. Parker 116 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1st Cir.9/5/07), , writ denied, 2007-1921 (La.2/15/08), .
State v. Letell 103 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1st Cir.9/5/07), , writ denied, 2007-1921 (La.2/15/08), .
State v. Duncan 91 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1 Cir. 9/5/07) , , the defendant argued on appeal that the trial court had erred in admitting the written out-of-court statements of two witnesses who testified at trial, and that the State had erroneously used the statements as substantive evidence instead of solely for purposes of impeachment.
State v. Craddock 62 So. 3d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1 Cir. 9/5/07), , writ denied, 07-1921 (La.2/15/08), .
State Ex Rel. Dw 47 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
1 Cir. 9/5/07); , writ denied, 07-1921 (La.2/15/08); .
State in the Interest of J.E. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 9/5/07), writ denied, 07-1921 (La.
State ex rel. J.E.T. 10 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 9/5/07), , writ denied, 07-1921 (La.2/15/08), , “[tjhere is no absolute requirement that an attorney or guardian must be present with a juvenile suspect at the time he makes the statement.” *1274 hfiThe presence of an interested adult, like age, however, is a factor to consider.
State Ex Rel. Jet 10 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 9/5/07), , writ denied, 07-1921 (La.2/15/08), , "[t]here is no absolute requirement that an attorney or guardian must be present with a juvenile suspect at the time he makes the statement."
State v. Peppers 5 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App, 1st Cir. 9/5/07), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by