Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jacobs, 987 So. 2d 286.

13 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Stephan M. Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/5/08), writ denied, 08-2000 (La.
State v. Bergeron 150 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/5/08) , , writ denied, 08-2000 (La.4/3/09), (thirty-year sentence upheld for forcible rape committed by a defendant with a significant criminal history and committed when Defendant broke into the victim’s motel room, took money from her purse, and engaged in non-consensual sex with the victim); State v. Steele, 10
State of Louisiana v. Eddie Ray Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/5/08), writ denied, 08-2000 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Lazaro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 6/5/08), (), writ denied, 08-2000 (La.
State v. Lazaro 125 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 6/5/08) , (), writ denied, 08-2000 (La.4/3/09), .
State of Louisiana v. Chad E. Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 6/5/08), -90, writ denied, 08-2000 (La.
State of Louisiana v. J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 6/5/08), -92, writ denied, 08-2000 (La.
State v. J.S. 63 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 6/5/08), -92 , unit denied, 08-2000 (La.4/3/09), , wherein this court affirmed a defendant’s thirty year sentence for the offense of forcible rape, this court noted the following standard to be used to review the excessiveness of the sentence: La.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 6/5/08), writ denied, 08-2000 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 6/5/08), -90, writ denied, 08-2000 (La.
State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 6/5/08), -90 , writ denied, 08-2000 (La.4/3/09), , wherein the defendant was convicted of aggravated burglary and forcible rape, this court discussed double jeopardy: In State v. Barton, 02-163, pp. 17-18, (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. T. S., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 6/5/08), -92 (alterations in original) this court explained in pertinent part: We have set forth the following standard to be used in reviewing excessive sentence claims: La.
State v. TS 5 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 6/5/08), -92 (alterations in original) this court explained in pertinent part: We have set forth the following standard to be used in reviewing excessive sentence claims: La.