DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Borel v. Young, 989 So. 2d 42.

125 citing documents.

  • Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co. 58 So. 3d 441 La. 2011
    See Borel v. Young, 2007-0419 (La.11/27/07), , quoting BlacK’s Law Dictionary, 1375 (6th ed.1990) 5 and citing Pittman Construction Co. v. Housing Authority of Opelousas, 167 F.Supp.
  • Blake v. Maley 57 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Borel v. Young, 07-0419 (La.11/27/07), .
  • Suhren v. Gibert 55 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See Borel v. Young, 2007-0419, pp. 28-29 (La.ll/27/07)(on reh’g), .
  • Lawrence v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital 48 So. 3d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Borel v. Young, 2007-0419, p. 29 (La.11/27/07), .
  • Ferrara v. Starmed Staffing, LP 50 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 12/10/08), (quoting Borel v. Young, 07-0419, p. 29 (La.7/01/08)(cm reh’g), ).
  • In Re Manus 40 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    Borel v. Young, 07-419, p. 2 (La.11/27/07), , on reh’g (La.7/1/08).
  • Bosarge v. DePaul/Tulane Behavioral Health Center 39 So. 3d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    But also see Borel v. Young, 07-0419, p. 27 (La.7/1/08), (“[T]he specific provisions of the Medical Malpractice Act regarding the suspension of prescription against joint tortfeasors apply to the exclusion of the general code article on interruption of prescription against joint tortfeasors, LSA-C.C.
  • Slaughter v. NORTH OAKS MEDICAL CENTER 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    7/1/078), (on rehearing); LeBreton, 714 So.
  • Hunter v. JINDAL 20 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    3461 and, e.g., Borel v. Young, 07-0419 (La.11/27/07), , on reh’g (07/01/08).
  • Naghi v. Brener 17 So. 3d 919 La. 2009
    9:5628(A), [1] which this court found prescriptive *927 in nature in Borel v. Young, 07-0419 (La.11/27/07), , on rehearing.
  • Distinguished Warren v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 186 La. 2009
    I write separately to point out that this case is distinguishable from the recent decision of this court in Borel v. Young, 07-0419 (La.11/27/07), , on reh'g, (7/1/08), 989 So.2d at 53-81 .
  • Talley v. St. Tammany Parish School Board 5 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • May Yen v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Yen v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 5 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Plaintiffs sought review from the supreme court, which remanded the matter in light of Borel v. Young, 07-419 (La.11/27/07), .
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Borel v. Young, 2007-0419, pp. 28-29 (La.7/1/08), .
  • Kampmann v. Mason 7 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    2324(C).” Borel v. Young, 2007-0419, p. 27 (La.11/27/07), .
  • Zoulek v. PIP America 2 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    In support of his exception, Dr. Weyrich relied upon the Louisiana Supreme Court decision Borel v. Young, 2007-0419 (La.11/27/07), .
  • LA. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. McWilliams 996 So. 2d 1036 La. 2008
    As the court noted in Borel v. Young, 07-0419, p. 21 (La.11/27/07), (on reh'g), once this court has ruled on an issue, we should be extremely reluctant to change our position, as both the legislature and society in general should be able to rely on the finality of our pronouncements.
  • Fruge v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF EMP. RETIREMENT 6 So. 3d 124 La. 2008
    Borel v. Young, 07-0419, p. 21 (La.11/27/07), (on reh'g).
  • May Yen v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 996 So. 2d 1080 La. 2008
    Case remanded to court of appeal in light of Borel v. Young, 07-0419 (La.11/27/07), .
  • Yen v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 996 So. 2d 1080 La. 2008
    Case remanded to court of appeal in light of Borel v. Young, 07-0419 (La.11/27/07), .
  • Pickett v. WILLIS-KNIGHTON PIERREMONT 998 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Discussion Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in relying on Borel v. Young, 07-0419 (La.11/27/07), , on reh'g, (07/01/08), to find that their claims against Dr. Cline were perempted.
  • Price v. MEDICAL CENTER OF LOUISIANA 999 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    See Borel v. *33 Young, XXXX-XXXX (La.8/29/08), .
  • Holmes v. LSU/EA Conway Medical Center 997 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Borel v. Young, 07-0419 (La.11/27/07), .
  • In Re Succession of James 994 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008