Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Ed. Fund, 986 So. 2d 47.

71 citing documents.

Rebel Distributors Corp. v. Luba Workers' Comp. 144 So. 3d 825 La. 2013
“When the facts alleged in the petition provide a remedy under the law to someone, but the plaintiff who seeks the relief is not the person in whose favor the law extends the remedy, the proper objection is no right of action, or want of interest in the plaintiff to institute the suit.” Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 07-2224, p. 16 (La.7/1/08), , citing 1 Frank L. Ma-raist & Harry T. Lemmon, Louisiana Civil *833 Law Treatise: Civil Procedure § 6.7, 121 (1999).
Stassi v. State 102 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Fund, 07-2224 (La.7/1/08), .
Aron's Pharmacy v. Bartlett 105 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Fund, 2007-2224 (La.7/1/08), .
Barber v. Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau 97 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Fund, 07-2224 (La.7/1/08), .
Niemann v. Crosby Development Co. 92 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
927(B) and 2163; Eagle Pipe, 79 So.3d at 255 n. 16; Howard, v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 2007-2224 (La.7/1/08), ; Howell v. Horrell, 99-1093 (La.App.
Anthony J. Beslin v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Beslin v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 87 So. 3d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Fund, 07-2224 (La.7/1/08), .
Tobin v. Jindal 91 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Gisclair v. Louisiana Tax Com’n, 2010-0563 (La.9/24/10), (quoting from Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 2007-2224 (La.7/1/08), -60 ).
Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation 79 So. 3d 246 La. 2011
Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 2007-2224 p. 16-17 (La.7/1/08), ; La.
ANR Pipeline Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission 76 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 2007-2224, p. 16 (La.7/1/08), .
Farmer's Seafood Co. v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety 56 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Fund, 07-2224 (La.7/1/08), .
Labranche v. Fatty's, LLC 48 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 2007-2224, p. 16 (La.7/1/08), .
Montgomery v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 51 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 10/22/07) , , rev’d in part, vacated in part, 07-2224 (La.7/1/08), .
Gisclair v. Louisiana Tax Commission 44 So. 3d 272 La. 2010
Recently, in Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 07-2224, pp. 16-17 (La.7/1/08), -60 , this Court discussed the peremptory exception of no right of action, explaining: When the facts alleged in the petition provide a remedy under the law to someone, but the plaintiff who seeks the relief is not the person in whose favor the law extends the remedy, the proper objection is no right of action, or
Red Stick Studio Development, L.L.C. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Development 37 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 2007-2224, p. 16 (La.7/1/08), .
Wakefield v. Kyle 12 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Fund, 07-2224 (La.7/1/08), ; Reese v. State Dep’t of Public Safety and Corrections, 03-1615 (La.2/20/04), ; Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
Taylor v. Babin 13 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 2007-2224, p. 16 (La.7/1/08), .
3218 Magazine, L.L.C. v. Lloyds of London 10 So. 3d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 934; Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 07-2224 (La.7/1/08), .
Craig A. Hebert v. Lawrence W. Blanchette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Hebert v. Blanchette 2 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Fund, 07-2224 (La.7/1/08), .
Heck v. Heck 998 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 2007-2224, p. 16 (La.7/1/08), .