Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Graubarth v. French Market Corp., 970 So. 2d 660.

20 citing documents.

Followed Jerry May, Perry May, David May, Vernell May Espa, and Irma May Taylor v. cooper/t. Smith Stevedoring Company, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 10/24/07), (citing Johnson v. State, 2002-2382, p. 4 (La.
Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents & Associates, Inc. v. the City of New Orleans, Through Its Board of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
4 Cir. 10/24/07); (citation omitted).
Lestelle & Lestelle, a Professional Law Corporation v. Campo Music Shopping Center Condominium Association and Gulf Coast Claim … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 10/24/07), wherein this Court indicated that “[a]ppellate courts generally find it inappropriate to consider an issue 4 raised for the first time on appeal that was not plead, urged, or addressed in the court below.” This argument is without merit as this matter is not before
Plaia v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 229 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Yokum v. 544 Funky, LLC 202 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 10/24/07), [citation omitted].
Lakewood Property Owners' Ass'n v. Kyle 183 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 10/24/07), [citation omitted].
In Re: Matter Under Investigation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 10/24/07), Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 1–3.
Davis v. Riverside Court Condominium Ass'n Phase II, Inc. 154 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 4 Cir. 10/24/07), -64 .
Doe v. University Healthcare Systems, L.L.C. 145 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/24/07), -664 .
Williams v. Three Girls, L.L.C. 142 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Tsegaye v. City of New Orleans 140 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Smith v. Treadaway 129 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
St. Philip v. Montalbano 108 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Theresa St. Julien v. Julie Walters Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 10/24/07), examining the liability of a custodian of a “thing” under 2317 and 2317.1 noted: [T]he courts have recognized the reality that custody or garde is a broader concept than ownership and custody or garde may be shared by multiple parties.
Julien v. Landry 94 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 10/24/07), , 664 examining the liability of a custodian of a “thing” under 2317 and 2317.1 noted: [T]he courts have recognized the reality that custody or garde is a broader concept than ownership and custody or garde may be shared by multiple parties.
Jones v. Department of Police 72 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Commercial Union Assurance PLC v. Tidewater Marine Service, Inc. 15 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 10/24/07) , ; Boudreaux v. State, DOTD, 2001-1329 (La.2/26/02), .
ADELMANN-CHESTER v. Kent 33 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Nelson v. Thibaut HG Corp. 977 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by