Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brumfield v. McElwee, 976 So. 2d 234.

19 citing documents.

Palmer v. Hamp's Construction, L.L.C. 204 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Tracy Ray Lomont v. Michelle Myer-Bennett and Xyz Insurance Company 172 So. 3d 620 La. 2015
App. 4 Cir. 1/16/08), Smith v. Slattery, 9 38,693 (La.
Hume v. Prestige Care, L.L.C. 165 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Explained Miralda v. Gonzalez 160 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 1/16/08), , “the latest one can file a legal malpractice action is three years from the date of the alleged act of malpractice, or one year from the date of discovery of the alleged act of malpractice, whichever comes first.” Id.
Garner v. Lizana 131 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/16/08) , , in support of its decision to grant the exception of per-emption, stating in its oral reasons for judgment: All right, Counsel, Revised Statute 9:5605 does create a three year peremp-tive period with regard to legal malpractice.
Williams v. CDY Development Corp. 124 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Smart v. Vazquez 119 So. 3d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dwyer v. Binegar 95 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Argence, L.L.C. v. Box Opportunities, Inc. 95 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Robert v. Robert Management Co. 82 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Smith v. Transport Services Co. 67 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Suhren v. Gibert 55 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 1/16/08), -41 (citing Scott v. American Tobacco, 04-2095, pp. 17-18 (La.App.
Williams v. EARL K. LONG MEDICAL CENTER 40 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 1/16/08), ; Hand v. City of New Orleans, 04-0845, p. 5 (La.App.
Reed v. St. Charles General Hospital 11 So. 3d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Needom v. Robein 7 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
London Livery, Ltd. v. Brinks 3 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
True Gospel of Jesus Christ Church Ministry v. Doucette 999 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
RAMELLI GROUP v. City of New Orleans 997 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 1/16/08), , this court reiterated the standard of review for a peremptory exception of prescription as follows: In reviewing a peremptory exception of prescription, an appellate court should not disturb the findings of the trial court unless it is clearly wrong.
McGuire v. Mosley Rogers Title Co., LLC 997 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
App. 4th Cir.1/16/08), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by