DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., 966 So. 2d 519.

79 citing documents.

  • W.P. v. Universal Health Services Foundation 91 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Ctr., Inc., 07-127, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), ; see also, LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., 07-0008, p. 6 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Montalbano v. Buffman Inc. 90 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hospital, 07-0008, 07-0016, pp. 6-7 (La.9/5/07), (citing Coleman v. Deno, 01-1517, pp. 15-16 (La.1/25/02), , and Williamson v. Hospital Service Dist.
  • Buford v. Williams 88 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    40:1299.47(A)(l)(a); LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., 2007-0008, p. 6 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Jones v. RUSTON LOUISIANA HOSP. CO., LLC 71 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    40:1299.47(A); LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., 2007-0008 (La.09/05/07), .
  • Jones v. Ruston Louisiana Hospital Co., L.L.C. 71 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    40:1299.47(A); LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., 2007-0008 (La.09/05/07), .
  • Heacock v. Cook 60 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    40:1299.47(A); LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., 2007-0008 (La.09/05/07), .
  • Hamilton v. Baton Rouge Health Care 52 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., 07-0008, p. 6 (La.9/5/07), -24 .
  • Scott Anthony Plaisance v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Ctr, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Plaisance v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. 47 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    40:1299.47(A); LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., 07-08, 07-16 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Lucky v. ENCANA OIL & GAS (USA), INC. 46 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hasp., L.L.C., 2007-0008 (La.09/05/07), .
  • Gordon v. Pointe Coupee Health Service District One 47 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In its opinion in LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hospital, L.L.C., 07-0008, p. 6 (La.9/5/07), , our supreme court, citing Coleman v. Deno, 01-1517, pp. 15-16 (La.1/25/02), , emphasized again that the LMMA and its limitations on tort liability for a qualified health care provider apply only to claims “arising from medical malpractice,” and that all other tort liability on the part of the
  • Gordon v. POINTE COUPEE HEALTH SERVICE 47 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In its opinion in LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hospital, L.L.C., 07-0008, p. 6 (La.9/5/07), , our supreme court, citing Coleman v. Deno, 01-1517, pp. 15-16 (La.1/25/02), , emphasized again that the LMMA and its limitations on tort liability for a qualified health care provider apply only to claims "arising from medical malpractice," and that all other tort liability on the part of the
  • Tina Derouen, Et Vir., Howard Derouen, III v. Park Place Surgery Center, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    9/5/07), -24, opined as follows: 2 Under the LMMA, a medical malpractice claim against a private qualified health care provider is subject to dismissal on an exception of prematurity if such claim has not first been presented to a medical review panel.
  • Derouen v. Park Place Surgical Center, LLC 37 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In a medical malpractice action brought against a private health care provider, our supreme court, in LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hospital, L.L.C., 07-08, 07-16, pp. 6-7 (La.9/5/07), -24 , opined as follows: | sUnder the LMMA, a medical malpractice claim against a private qualified health care provider is subject to dismissal on an exception of prematurity if such claim has not first been presented to a medical review panel.
  • Debra Bergeron Duhon v. Petro E", LLC " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    9/5/07), explained the burden of proof in an exception of prematurity: In the instant case, the defendant hospital, which has the burden of proof as the exceptor, has chosen to rely on the allegations as set forth in the plaintiffs’ original and first supplemental and amending petitions, because
  • Duhon v. PETRO" E", LLC 34 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., 07-0008, 07-0016, pp. 8 (La.9/5/07), , explained the burden of proof in an exception of prematurity: In the instant case, the defendant hospital, which has the burden of proof as the exceptor, has chosen to rely on the allegations as set forth in the plaintiffs’ original and first supplemental and amending petitions, because the defendant put on no
  • Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Bridges 28 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hospital, L.L.C., 07-0008, p. 5 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Jason Vidrine, Et Ux. v. J & J Exterminating Company Ofalexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Vidrine v. J & J Exterminating Co. of Alexandria 20 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., LLC, 07-0008 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Price v. MEDICAL CENTER OF LOUISIANA 999 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hospital, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Jackson v. United Services Automobile Ass'n Casualty Insurance Co. 1 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    P. art. 926; LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C.
  • Mineo v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON 997 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    We disagree, finding that LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hospital, L.L.C., XXXX-XXXX (La.9/5/07), , controls the disposition of this matter.
  • Thelma v. Volunteers of America, Inc. 996 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    L.L.C., 07-0008 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Leonard v. STATE, DHH-RUSTON DEVEL. CENTER 975 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 6-7 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Preston v. Tenet Healthsystems Memorial Medical Center, Inc. 970 So. 2d 521 La. 2007
    The case is remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decision in LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hospital, L.L.C., 07-0008 c/w 07-0016 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Duplessis v. Tulane University 972 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Lacoste, 07-0008, p. 2 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Schiro v. ACADIAN AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. 970 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    LaCoste v. Pendelton Methodist Hospital, 07-0008 (La.9/5/07), .
  • Berthelot v. Patients' Compensation Fund Oversight Board 977 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    | ¡ANALYSIS The PCF relies on the recent supreme court decision, LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp., L.L.C., 07-0008 (La.9/5/07), , for jurisprudential support of its determination that allegations of failure to.
  • Lafonta v. Hotard Coaches, Inc. 969 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Stephen B. LaCoste v. Pendelton Methodist Hospital, XXXX-XXXX (La.9/5/07) .