Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Frey Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Foster, 996 So. 2d 969.
-
Uniti Fiber, LLC Versus Miller Pipeline, LLC
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
2/26/08), in which the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a plumbing company’s lawsuit against a customer was a claim on an open account under La.
-
Diamond Services Corporation v. Cobbs, Allen, & Hall of Louisiana, Inc.; Dual Corporate Risks, Ltd.; Lloyd's Syndicate NVA …
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
2/ 26/ 08), by broadening the criteria for what is classified as an open account.
-
Garcia Roofing Replacement, LLC v. Michael D'Aquin
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
2/ 26/ 08), held that, under a plain reading of La.
-
Allen D. DeArmond v. E. Jacob Construction, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
2/ 26/ 08), ( per cunam).
-
Louisiana Machinery Company, LLC and Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Bihm Equipment Co., Inc., Shaw Environment, Inc., …
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
2/ 26/ 08), ( per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a trial court's finding, on a motion for partial summary judgment, that a plumbing company' s suit against a homeowner did not involve an open account because the services were for a first and only transaction between the parties, there w
-
Union Christian Academy v. Jason Shirey
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
2/26/08), Doerle Food Servs., L.L.C. v. River Valley Foods, L.L.C., 52,601 (La.
-
Advanced Leveling & Concrete Solutions v. The Lathan Company, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
2/ 26/ 08); ( per curiam).
-
SBL Construction, LLC v. Michael M. Eymard and Tram Investments, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2126108), ( per curiam), a homeowner hired a plumbing company to fix an underground pipe at her residence.
-
Doerle Food Servs., L. L.C. v. River Valley Foods, L. L.C.
273 So. 3d 656
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
2/26/08), ; Monsanto Co. v. KT Farms P'ship through Aymond , 51,740 (La.
- Monsanto Co. v. KT Farms P'ship 245 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
-
Akers v. Bernhard Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
137 So. 3d 818
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
He cites Frey Plumbing Inc. v. Foster, 2007-1091 (La.2/26/08), , which “expanded” the concept of open account to encompass any situation where “the total cost, unlike a contract, is generally left open or undetermined, although the rate for specific services may be fixed.” He also cites Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp. v. Ballast Techs.
-
Retail Merchants Ass'n v. Forrester
114 So. 3d 1175
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
See also Frey Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Foster, 2007-1091 (La.2/26/08), , for a discussion of what constitutes an open account.
- Eastern Solutions, Inc. v. Naji Al-Fouzan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
Eastern Solutions, Inc. v. Al-Fouzan
103 So. 3d 1190
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Frey Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Foster, 07-1091 (La.2/26/08), .
-
Fleet Intermodal Services, LLC v. St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District
60 So. 3d 85
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Appellant correctly points out that in Frey Plumbing Company, Inc. v. Foster, 2007-1091, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), , the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected pri- or multi-factor tests in determining what constitutes an “open account” for the purpose of obtaining attorney’s fees under the statute, and held that an |1s“open account” is clearly defined by the statute itself.
-
Touro Infirmary v. American Maritime Officer
34 So. 3d 878
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
A single transaction, such as the one in the present case, now falls within the definition of an ‘open account’ and attorney fees are appropriate in such cases.” Subsequently, the Louisiana Supreme Court also concluded in Frey Plumbing Company, Inc. v. Foster, 07-1091, p. 6 (La.2/26/08), , 972 that an open account relationship could be based on a single transaction.
-
Credit Bureau Services v. Steven C. Lundberg
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/26/08), the supreme court recently held that this statute must be applied as written.
-
Credit Bureau Services v. Lundberg
10 So. 3d 883
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Frey Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Foster, 07-1091, (La.2/26/08), , the supreme court recently held that this statute must be applied as written.