DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 978 So. 2d 895.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Randy Lee Turner La. 2019
  • State v. Williams 236 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    2/26/08), , 897 ( per curiam ).
  • State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua Jerome Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    The same evidence test “considers the actual physical and testimonial evidence necessary to secure a conviction, and concerns itself with the „evidential focus‟ of the facts adduced at trial in light of the verdict rendered, i.e., how the evidence satisfies the prosecution‟s burden of proof.” State v. Williams, 07-0931, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), (-03 (La.1984).
  • State v. Ball 209 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    2/26/08), (-03 (La.1984).
  • State v. Lodge 195 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    The same evidence test “considers the actual physical and testimonial evidence necessary to secure a conviction, and concerns itself with the ‘evidential focus’ of the facts adduced at trial in light of the verdict rendered, i.e., how the evidence satisfies the prosecution’s- burden of proof.” State v. Williams, 07-0931, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), (-03 (La.1984).
  • State v. Darensbourg 183 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    The same evidence test “considers the actual physical and testimonial evidence necessary to secure a conviction, and concerns itself with the ‘evidential focus’ of the facts adduced at trial in light of the verdict rendered, i.e., how the evidence satisfies the prosecution’s burden of proof.” State v. Williams, 2007-0931, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State v. Butler 162 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Williams, 07-0931, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Williams, 07-0931, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State v. Magee 146 So. 3d 193 La. 2014
    State v. Williams, 07-0931, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State v. Magee 140 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    me evidence test “considers the actual physical and testimonial evidence necessary to secure a conviction, and concerns its self [sic] | Bwith the eviden-tiary focus’ of the facts adduced at trial in light of the verdict rendered, i.e., how the evidence satisfies the prosecution’s burden of proof.” Jones , 2012-0565, p. 7, 115 So.3d at 648 (quoting State v. Williams, 2007-0931, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), ).
  • State v. Childs 133 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The same evidence test “considers the actual physical and testimonial evidence necessary to secure a conviction, and concerns itself with the ‘evidential focus’ of the facts adduced at trial in light of the verdict rendered, i.e., how the evidence satisfies the prosecution’s burden of proof.” State v. Williams, 07-0931, p. 5 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Daye La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Williams, 07–931 (La.2/26/08)
  • State v. Petitto 116 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Williams, 07-0931 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State v. Jones 115 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    First, I am unconvinced that State v. Williams, 2007-0931 (La.2/26/08), , is necessarily dispositive.
  • State of Louisiana v. Edwin N. Rivera La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08)
  • State of Louisiana v. Letrakus Tyler AKA Trey Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08)
  • State v. Tyler 93 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus W. Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08)
  • State v. Anderson 66 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Jason Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08)
  • State v. Miller 49 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. James E. Ramsdell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    180 (1932); State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08)
  • State v. Ramsdell 47 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    306 (1932); State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Chrishon M. Archield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. ARCHIELD 34 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 07-931 (La.2/26/08), .
  • State v. Jacobs 987 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In a recent case, State v. Williams, 07-931, p. 3 (La.2/26/08), , the supreme court discussed the issue of the State's recourse when it violated a defendant's constitutional right against double jeopardy and stated: As opposed to quashing the prosecution altogether and setting aside defendant's guilty plea and sentence, the court of appeal should have, assuming the correctnes