Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 23 So. 3d 291.

25 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Brian Clarke La. 2022
10/20/09), (“ Under present law, armed robbery is a general intent, not specific intent, crime.”).
State Of Louisiana v. Larry Paul Clayton La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
10/ 20/ 09), ( per curiam).
State Of Louisiana v. Jordan Cyprian La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
10/ 20/ 09), (per curiam) (" a general principle of accessorial liability [ is] when two or more persons embark on a concerted course of action, each person becomes responsible for not only his own acts but also for the acts of the other, including ` deviations from the common plan which are the foreseeable
State of Louisiana v. Corday Treveil Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Benjamin Bailey La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/ 20/ 09), ( per curiam).
State v. Williams 266 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
10/20/09), ; State v. Anderson , 97-1301 (La.
State v. Becnel 265 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/20/09), , 298 n.3 (per curiam).
State v. Leonard 262 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Clark 259 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Fitch 244 So. 3d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/20/09), , 298 n.3 ( per curiam ).
State v. De Gruy 215 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Tedrick Jewan Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Richardson 210 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Amos 192 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 2007-2028, p. 10 (La.10/20/09), .
State v. Gibson 197 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
However, armed robbery is a general intent crime, and general intent is present “when circumstances indicate that the offender, in the ordinary course of human experience, must have adverted to the prescribed criminal consequences as reasonably certain to result from his act or failure to act.” State v. Smith, 2007-2028, p. 10 (La.10/20/09), ; La.
State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
10/20/09), ; State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), , cert.
State v. Franklin 142 So. 3d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
An offender has the requisite intent when “from the circumstances the prohibited result may reasonably be expected to follow from the offender’s voluntary act, irrespective of any subjective desire on his part to have accomplished such result.” State v. Smith, 07-2028 (La.10/20/09); -98 .
State v. Morgan 119 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Smith, 07-2028 (La.10/20/09), (per curiam).
State of Louisiana v. Ronald G. Acker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Acker 111 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Smith, 07-2028, p. 10 (La.10/20/09), .
State v. Davis 111 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Smith, 2007-2028 (La.10/20/09), (per curiam).
State v. Leday 97 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See *506 State v. Smith, 07-2028, p. 10 (La.10/20/09), .
State v. Harrche 81 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 07-2028, p. 11 (La.10/20/09), , 298 n. 3 (per curiam).
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. McFarland, 07-26 at 10, 960 So.2d at 1148 ; See also, State v. Smith, 07-2028, p. 8 (La.10/20/09), (per curium ) (a simple burglary may turn into an aggravated burglary and then escalate further into a second degree felony murder, well beyond the original plan of the defendant or his accomplice who then unexpectedly kills during the commission of the underlying felony offense).
State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2007-2028 (La.10/20/09), .