DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 980 So. 2d 707.

23 citing documents.

  • State v. Meadows 246 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Dietrich Jamal Thibodeaux AKA Dietrich Thibodeaux AKA Dietrich J. Thibodeaux Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    5/16/08), (alteration in the original), discussed departure from mandatory penalties as follows: [A] court may depart from mandatory penalties provided by the legislature for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is “exceptional, which in this context means that be
  • State v. Thibodeaux 100 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 10/31/07), , writ denied, 07-2484 (La.5/16/08), (alteration in the original), discussed departure from mandatory penalties as follows: [A] court may depart from mandatory penalties provided by the legislature for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is “exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a victim of
  • State of Louisiana v. J. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. J. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Fred Ballard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/31/07), writ denied, 07-2484 (La.5/16/08), (alteration in original), this court discussed departure from mandatory penalties as follows: [A] court may depart from mandatory penalties provided by the legislature for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is “exceptional, which in this contex
  • State v. Womack 55 So. 3d 43 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Warren, 42,699 (La.App.2d Cir.10/24/07), , writ denied, 07-2485 (La.05/16/08), , citing La.
  • State of Louisiana v. James Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    5/16/08), favorably cited State v. Smith, 06-820 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 45 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/31/07), , writ denied, 07-2484 (La.5/16/08), , favorably cited State v. Smith, 06-820 (La.App.
  • State v. Harrell 40 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2 Cir. 10/24/07), , writ denied, 07-2485 (La.5/16/08), .
  • State v. Shelton 39 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2 Cir. 10/24/07), , writ denied, 07-2485 (La.5/16/08), , the defendant argued his guilty pleas to attempted second degree murder and armed robbery were not knowingly and voluntarily made because the trial court failed to inform him his sentences would be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
  • State of Louisiana v. Wilkes Laird La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Laird 30 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/31/07) , , writ denied, 07-2484 (La.5/16/08), .
  • State v. Egan 26 So. 3d 938 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    4 ; State v. Warren, 42,699 (La.App.2d Cir.10/24/07), , writ denied, 2007-2485 (La.5/16/08), .
  • State v. DSJ 15 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 10/31/07), , writ denied, 07-2484 (La.5/16/08), (alteration in original), this court discussed departure from mandatory penalties as follows: [A] court may depart from mandatory penalties provided by the legislature for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is "exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a vic
  • State of Louisiana v. D. S. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    5/16/08), (alteration in original), this court discussed departure from mandatory penalties as -7- follows: [A] court may depart from mandatory penalties provided by the legislature for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is “exceptional, which in t
  • State v. D.S.J. 15 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 10/31/07), , writ denied, 07-2484 (La.5/16/08), (alteration in original), this court discussed departure from mandatory penalties as | ¿follows: [A] court may depart from mandatory penalties provided by the legislature for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is “exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony A. Tapp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    5/16/08), this court stated: This court considered a similar issue in State v. Prudhomme, 02-511, p. 16 (La.App.
  • State v. Tapp 8 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 10/31/07), , writ denied, 07-2484 (La.5/16/08), , this court stated: This court considered a similar issue in State v. Prudhomme, 02-511, p. 16 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph L. Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Roberts 4 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    App. 3 Cir. 10/31/07), , writ denied, 07-2484 (La.5/16/08), .
  • State v. Tassin 998 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir. 10/31/07), , writ denied, 07-2484 (La.5/16/08), (alteration in original), this court discussed departure from mandatory penalties as follows: [A] court may depart from mandatory penalties provided by the legislature for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is "exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a vic
  • State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    5/16/08), (alteration in original), this court discussed departure from mandatory penalties as follows: [A] court may depart from mandatory penalties provided by the legislature for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is “exceptional, which in this context mea