In Re Favret
In Re Favret, 983 So. 2d 66 (La. 2008).
Cited by
Explained in 2
- Ryan Fremin Husband of/and Rebecca Fremin Versus Anpac Louisiana Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
- Jackson v. St. John the Baptist Parish School Board 177 So. 3d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Rodriguez-Roble v. American National Property & Casualty Co. 176 So. 3d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Barham v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co. 144 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
- State v. Nye 89 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Eddie Ray Jackson v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- Smith v. State 84 So. 3d 487 La. 2012
- J.R.A. Inc. v. Essex Insurance Co. 72 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Texans Credit Union v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry 64 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Frught v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 27 So. 3d 270 La. 2010
- Thibodeaux v. Donnell 9 So. 3d 120 La. 2009
- Frught v. Lafayette Insurance Company 993 So. 2d 1271 La. 2008
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- In re Favret 669 So. 2d 411
Opinion text
983 So.2d 66 (2008) In re Gregory J. FAVRET and Office of Disciplinary Counsel. No. 2008-B-0780. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 2, 2008. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent engaged in misconduct involving conversion of client funds. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, seeking respondent's disbarment. Having reviewed the petition, IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Gregory J. Favret, Louisiana Bar Roll number 5483, be and he hereby is disbarred, retroactive to the date of his interim suspension ordered in In re: Favret, 96-0574 (La.3/8/96), 669 So.2d 411 . His name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys and his license to practice law in the State of Louisiana shall be revoked. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid. TRAYLOR and KNOLL, JJ., would reject consent discipline.