Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. VIDALIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, 992 So. 2d 1039.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Julieanne Perales A/K/A Julianne Perales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Robert Celestine, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Damari Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Damari Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Jontreal A. Fisher La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
10/24/08), the defendant argued that his attorneys were ineffective because they failed to investigate his case or to formulate a defense to prove his innocence.
State v. Johnson 264 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Jackson 259 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/24/08), , the defendant filed a pro se brief in which he argued his attorneys were ineffective because they failed to investigate his case or formulate a defense to prove his innocence.
State v. Williams 251 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Joseph 205 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hollins 174 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Benson, 43,150 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/08), , writ denied, 2008-0814 (La.10/24/08), .
State v. Joseph 169 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 3/25/08) , , writ denied, 08-813 (La.10/24/08), .
State v. Martin 167 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 3/25/08), , writ denied, 08-813 (La.10/24/08), , the defendant argued that his attorneys were ineffective because they failed to investigate his case or to formulate a defense to prove his innocence.
State v. Boston 167 So. 3d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 3/25/08) , , writ denied, 08-813 (La.10/24/08), .
State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
10/24/08), while discussing the withdrawal of a guilty plea, the fifth circuit stated: Generally, a denial of a Motion to Withdraw a Guilty Plea will not be reversed on appeal if the record clearly shows the defendant was informed of his rights and the consequences of his plea, and that the plea
State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
10/24/08), while discussing the withdrawal of a guilty plea, the fifth circuit stated: Generally, a denial of a Motion to Withdraw a Guilty Plea will not be reversed on appeal if the record clearly shows the defendant was informed of his rights and the consequences of his plea, and that the plea
State v. Isaac 108 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 3/25/08), , writ denied, 08-0813 (La.10/24/08), .
State v. Matthews 22 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 3/25/08), , writ denied, 08-0813 (La.10/24/08), .
State v. Holt 12 So. 3d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Scott 8 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. *665 3/25/08), , writ denied, 08-0813 (La.10/24/08), .
State v. Mitchell 7 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 3/25/08) , , writ denied, 08-0813 (La.10/24/08), , the defendant filed a pro se brief in which he argued his attorneys were ineffective because they failed to investigate his case or to formulate a defense to prove his innocence.