DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc., 16 So. 3d 1065.

258 citing documents.

  • Becker v. Jefferson Parish Department of Parks & Recreation 30 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc., 2008-1163 (La.5/22/09), (citing Parish Nat.
  • Katner v. Katner 28 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc., 08-1163, p. 21 (La.5/22/09), .
  • MWD SERVICES, INC. v. Humphries 26 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc., 08-1163, p. 10 (La.5/22/09), .
  • Baker v. Baker 27 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The supreme court recently addressed prescription in *967 Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc., 08-1169, p. 10 (La.5/22/09), , 1082: If prescription is evident on the face of the pleadings, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show the action has not prescribed.
  • Gary v. Moncla Well Service 21 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    quoted in Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc., 08-1163, p. (La.5/22/09), .
  • DiBenedetto v. Noble Drilling Co. 23 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    23:1031.1; Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc., 2008- 1163, 2008-1169 (La.5/22/09), .
  • Spectrum Automotive Finishes, Inc. v. Westbank Body Works, Inc. 27 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    One of the basic tenets of the manifest error standard of review is that “reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the court of appeal is convinced that had it been the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.” Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc., 2008-1163 (La.5/22/09), (citing Parish Nat.
  • Hunter v. JINDAL 20 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc., 2008-1163 (La.5/22/09), ; (La.