Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hebert v. Webre, 982 So. 2d 770.

30 citing documents.

Janice Goodson v. Goauto Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Louise Theresa Doty v. Goauto Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
2 Cir. 5/21/08), the principal distinction between Lejeune damages and most wrongful death cases is the spatial or temporal proximity of the plaintiff to the scene of the accident.
Doty v. Goauto Ins. Co. 251 So. 3d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/21/08), , the principal distinction between Lejeune damages and most wrongful death cases is the spatial or temporal proximity of the plaintiff to the scene of the accident.
Brandi Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Hebert v. Webre, 08-60 (La.5/21/08)
Billeaudeau v. Opelousas Gen. Hosp. Auth. 243 So. 3d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Brandi Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Hebert v. Webre, 08-60 (La.5/21/08)
Billeaudeau v. Opelousas Gen. Hosp. Auth. 244 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Smith v. Thomas 214 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
5/21/08), , the Supreme Court considered a similar issue in a survival action/wrongful death case.
Shane Eads v. Chartis Specialty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
5/21/08), -74 (citations omitted).
Eads v. Chartis Specialty Ins. Co. 133 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Hebert v. Webre, 08-60, pp. 4-5 (La.5/21/08), -74 (citations omitted).
Bolton v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 116 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Hebert v. Webre, 08-0060 (La.5/21/08), ; Clark v. G.B.
Naomi Williams v. Arista Andrus La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Williams v. Andrus 74 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Hebert v. Webre, 08-60 (La.5/21/08), .
Burmaster v. Plaquemines Parish Government 64 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Hebert v. Webre, 08-0060, p. 4 (La.5/21/08), .
Hoagboon v. Cannon 54 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hebert v. Webre, 08-0060, p. 4 (La.5/21/08), .
Linda J. Burns v. Ted and Don Couvillion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Burns v. Couvillion 53 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hebert v. Webre, 08-60 (La.5/21/08), .
Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
uisiana Supreme Court has held that “[t]he determination of the severity of mental anguish of distress resulting from the death of another is a fact question which depends upon several components, including, but not limited to, the closeness of the ties between the parties, the degree of love in the relationship, and the length of the relationship.” Herbert v. Webre, 2008-0060, p. 8 (La.5/21/08), n. 7 (citing Hill v. Shelter Mut.
Jimmy L. Smith, Jr. v. Alan C. Hampshire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/21/08), resolved this very issue in State Farm’s favor.
Smith v. Hampshire 37 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State Farm and the trial court in its written reasons agree that, with regard to the policy language in this case, the supreme court in Hebert v. Webre, 08-60 (La.5/21/08), , resolved this very issue in State Farm’s favor.
Estopinal v. Parish of St. Bernard 32 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Hebert v. Webre, 08-0060, p. 4 (La.5/21/08), .
Bourgeois v. Meyer 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5/21/08), , has "laid to rest" the issues regarding whether the wrongful death and survival action claims of the children are subject to a single $100,000 per person limit, as opposed to the aggregate $300,000 per accident limit.
Martha B. Bonin v. Brian A. Verret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Bonin v. Verret 15 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
More recently, the supreme court decided the case of Hebert v. Webre, 08-60 (La.5/21/08), .
Thomas Allen v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Allen v. Allstate Insurance Co. 10 So. 3d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hebert v. Webre, 08-60, pp. 4-5 (La.5/21/08), -74 .
Chicago Property Interests, L.L.C. v. Broussard 8 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hebert v. Webre, 2008-0060 (La.5/21/08), .
Stacey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 32 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Hebert v. Webre, 2008-0060 (La.5/21/08) , the Supreme Court examined the exact language of the State Farm policy questioned in this case.
Jackson v. United Services Automobile Ass'n Casualty Insurance Co. 1 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Subervielle v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 995 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Recently, in Hebert v. Webre, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/21/08), , the Louisiana Supreme Court examined State Farm policy language identical to the language at issue here.