Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Naghi v. Brener, 17 So. 3d 919.

58 citing documents.

Distinguished Scaglione v. Juneau 40 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
1 Finally, the lower courts erred in relying on Naghi v. Brener, 08-2527 (La.6/26/09), , to find that any and all additional pleadings were perempted, because the facts of that case are distinguishable.
Scaglione v. Juneau 41 So. 3d 1287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Naghi v. Brener, 08-2527, p. 10 (La.6/26/09), , proclaimed that "there can be no escaping the fact that relation back interferes with the operation of the prescriptive or peremptive time period in that it avoids its operation."
Bailey v. Enervest Operating Co., LLC 43 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
In Naghi v. Brener, 2008-2527, p. 6 (La.6/26/09), , the supreme court explained that a period is peremptive when a statute creates a right of action and stipulates the delay within which the right of action may be executed.
Thomas v. Ardenwood Properties 43 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
*217 The most recent pronouncement of the Louisiana Supreme Court regarding whether a tardily filed claim can relate back to the filing date of other timely filed claims when a peremptive period is involved is found in Naghi v. Brener, 08-2527 (La.6/26/09), .
Estate of Robinson v. Continental Casualty Co. 31 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
However, in Naghi v. Brener, 2008-2527 (La.6/26/09), , the court rejected an argument that an amended petition adding or substituting plaintiffs should be allowed to relate back to the original timely filed petition in a legal malpractice action.
Cutler v. Parole Board 30 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Charles Glisan, Et Ux. v. Michael Eaton, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/26/09), Yen v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury, 07-225 (La.App.
Glisan v. Eaton 30 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3458 and 3461; Naghi v. Brener, 08-2527 (La.6/26/09), ; *1153 Yen v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury, 07-225 (La.App.