Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bertrand, 6 So. 3d 738.

195 citing documents.

State v. Funes 87 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The State asserts that this claim has no merit, arguing that Louisiana courts have long rejected the claim that a non-unanimous jury verdict is unconstitutional, cit *136 ing State v. Bertrand, 08-2215 (La.3/17/09)
State v. Ott 80 So. 3d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 9/29/10) , , discussed the long standing jurisprudence and referenced the Louisiana Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. Miller 83 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, p. 8 (La.3/17/09), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the district court, which held Article 782 was unconstitutional and explained the following: Due to this Court’s prior determinations that Article 782 withstands constitutional scrutiny, and because we are not presumptuous enough to suppose, upon mere speculation, that the U
State v. Funes 88 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, p. 8 (La.3/17/09), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the district court, which held Article 782 was unconstitutional and explained the following: Due to this Court’s prior determinations that Article 782 withstands constitutional scrutiny, and because we are not presumptuous enough to suppose, upon mere speculation, that the U
State v. Mosley 80 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See, State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), ; State v. Divers, 38,524 (La.App.2d Cir.11/23/04),15 *1174 , writ denied, 2004-3186 (La.4/8/05), , cert.
State v. Jones 81 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09)
State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3/17/09), -43, the supreme court discussed non-unanimous jury verdicts as follows: In Apodaca, the United States Supreme Court examined an Oregon statute similar to Article 782, in that the Oregon statute did not require unanimous jury verdicts in noncapital cases.
State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Collins, 2010-1181, p. 12, 62 So.3d at 275 , citing State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215, p. 8 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. Jackson 76 So. 3d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), ; State v. Boudreaux, 2008-1504 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Tanesha Hardy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3/17/09), while reviewing a Louisiana judicial district court’s declaration that Article 782 was unconstitutional for the reason that it permitted non-unanimous verdicts.
State of Louisiana v. Kerry Jerrod Sanders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Hardy 72 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The holding of Apodaca was discussed with approval by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, (La.3/17/09), , while reviewing a Louisiana judicial district court’s declaration that Article 782 was unconstitutional for the reason that it permitted non-unanimous verdicts.
State v. Sanders 74 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); State v. Bertrand, 08-2215 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 9/29/10) , , this court noted: In State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), , the trial court found that La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Wade 77 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, p. 5 (La.3/17/09), , the Court again affirmed the statute’s constitutionality.
State v. Carter 75 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bertrand, 08-2311, p. 7 (La.3/17/09), ; State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.App.
State v. Joseph 71 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 9/4/09) , ; both following State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, 08-2311 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. Green 69 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), (finding this issue has no merit).
State v. Ingram 71 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.03/17/09), .
State v. Bishop 68 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, p. 6 (La.3/17/09), ; State v. Smith, 06-0820, p. 24 (La.App.
State v. Adams 68 So. 3d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 ; State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, 08-2311, p. 8 (La.3/17/09), ; State v. Barbour, 09-1258 (La.App.
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
782 does not violate the Sixth or Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.” Finally, in State v. Bertrand, 08-2215 (La.3/17/09), , the Louisiana *592 Supreme Court recently reversed a district court ruling that La.C.Cr.P.
Explained State v. Barnett 70 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09)
State v. Payton 68 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, 08-2311 (La.3/17/09), ; State v. Boudreaux, 08-1504 (La.App.
State v. Collins 65 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 9/29/10) , , this Court noted: In State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), , the trial court found that La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Collins 62 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215, 2008-2311, p. 8 (La.3/17/09), .
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3/17/09), ruled that the statute permitting non-unanimous twelve person jury verdicts of second degree murder were constitutional, Defendant nonetheless asserts that this court should consider the recent analysis of McDonald v. Chicago, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct.
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While conceding that State v. Bertrand, 08-2215 (La.3/17/09), , ruled that the statute permitting non-unanimous twelve person jury verdicts of second degree murder were constitutional, Defendant nonetheless asserts that this court should con *1150 sider the recent analysis of McDonald v. Chicago, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct.
State v. Johnson 57 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
1620 , 32 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972); State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), .
Explained State v. Winslow 55 So. 3d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), -742 ; (La.
State v. Green 52 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/24/10) , , following State v. Bertrand, 2008-2214, 2008-2311 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. Thomas 54 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
art. 782 does not violate the Sixth or Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.” Recently, in State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, p. 8 (La.3/17/09); , the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the district court, which held Article 782 was unconstitutional, reasoning: Due to this Court’s prior determinations that Article 782 withstands constitutional scrutiny, and because we are not presumptuous enough to suppose, upon mere speculation, that the United States Supr
State v. Boudreaux 48 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), , the trial court found that La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Lawrence 47 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, 08-2311, p. 8 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. Blow 46 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1620 , 32 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972); State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), .
Scott v. American Tobacco Co., Inc. 36 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 782 A and State v. Bertrand, 08-2215 (La.3/17/09), ; State v. Taylor, 09-0041, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Moody 38 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Recently, in State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215, p. 6 (La.3/17/09), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed and upheld the constitutionality of non-unanimous jury verdicts: ...
State v. McKnight 37 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 9/4/09) , , following State v. Bertrand, 2008-2214, 2008-2311 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. Every 35 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, 08-2311 (La.3/17/09), , reversed a trial court ruling declaring La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Barbour 35 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State Bertrand, 08-2215 (La.3/17/09), , the trial court found that La.C.Cr.P.
State ex rel. A.J. 27 So. 3d 247 La. 2009
State v. Bertrand, 08-2215 (La.3/17/09), .
In Re State Ex Rel. AJ 27 So. 3d 247 La. 2009
State v. Bertrand, 08-2215 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. Jones 29 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. Taylor 21 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215, 2008-2311 (La.3/17/09), .
State v. Smith 20 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Bertrand, 08-2215 (La.3/17/09), .