DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite STATE EX REL. DAUGHTRY v. State, 992 So. 2d 1033.

21 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Jerome Hyde La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    10/24/08), (“The proper procedure for seeking review of a misdemeanor conviction is an application for writ of review directed to this Court to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction.”) In order to obtain review of a misdemeanor conviction by an application for a supervisory writ, a defendant is required to file a notic
  • State of Louisiana Versus William B Barnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana Versus Carlos McKnight, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana Versus Abdellah Karim La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana Versus Abdellah Karim La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana Versus Shawn A. Clark La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    10/24/08), wherein the court found that the defendant was not prejudiced on appeal due to the absence of transcribed bench conferences regarding jury voir dire.
  • State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    10/24/08); the defendant argued that his right to full appellate review was impinged because the in-chambers portion of voir dire, where he raised challenges for cause, was not available.
  • State v. Blackwell 263 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Vaughn 248 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Brown 239 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Carroll 213 So. 3d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/24/08), the defendant argued that his right to full appellate review was impinged because the in-chambers portion of voir dire, where he raised challenges for cause, was not available.
  • State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/23/08) , , writ denied, *86 08-413 (La.10/24/08), , the defendant argued that his right to full appellate review was impinged because the in-chambers portion of voir dire, where he raised challenges for cause, was not available.
  • State v. Jones 128 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 3/11/08), , writ denied, 08-0784 (La.10/24/08), .
  • State v. Davis 128 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 3/11/08) , , writ denied, 08-0784 (La.10/24/08), .
  • State v. Banks 128 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    App. 5 Cir. 3/11/08), , writ denied, 08-0784 (La.10/24/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/23/08), writ denied, 08-413 (La.10/24/08), the defendant argued that his right to full appellate review was impinged because the in-chambers portion of voir dire, where he raised challenges for cause, was not available.
  • State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/23/08) , , unit denied, 08-413 (La.10/24/08), , the defendant argued that his right to full appellate review was impinged because the in-chambers portion of voir dire, where he raised challenges for cause, was not available.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    10/24/08), the defendant argued that his right to full appellate review was impinged because the in-chambers portion of voir dire, where he raised challenges for cause, was not available.
  • State of Louisiana v. L. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    10/24/08), wherein the court found that the defendant was not prejudiced on appeal due to the absence of transcribed bench conferences regarding the jury voir dire.