Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillory v. Lee, 16 So. 3d 1104.

202 citing documents.

Guillory v. Saucier 79 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
With regard to an assessment of damages, La.Civ.Code art. 2324.1 provides that “much discretion must be left to the judge or jury.” In Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075 (La.6/26/09), , the supreme court described this discretion as “vast.” Only after a determination that the trier of fact has abused this vast discretion does an appellate court disturb a trier of fact’s determination and reference prior awards.
Dyna Mitte v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/26/09), -27, the supreme court discussed claims for penalties and attorney fees arising from disputed tenders from insurance companies, stating (case citations omitted) (footnote omitted) (alteration in original): In order to establish a cause of action for penalties and/or attorney fees and costs
Daigle v. City of Shreveport 78 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Guillory v. Lee, 2009-0075 (La.06/26/09), .
Reeves v. Grove 72 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075, p. 14 (La.6/26/09), , the Court reiterated the long-held tenet that a jury has “great discretion” in assessing damages and that a jury’s assessment of damages is “a determination of fact” which is “entitled to great deference on review.” Accordingly, when reviewing general damage awards, our role is to review the trier of fact’s ex
Jouve v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 74 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Guillory v. Lee, 2009-0075, p. 38 (La.6/26/09), .
McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital 65 So. 3d 1218 La. 2011
Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075, p. 14 (La.6/29/09), ; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
J.R.A. Inc. v. Essex Insurance Co. 72 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075, p. 13 (La.6/26/09), .
BRUMBERGER v. Touro Infirmary 63 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(citing Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075 (La.6/26/09), ).
Curry v. Healthsouth North Rehabilitation Hospital-Homer Campus 58 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Guillory v. Lee, 2009-0075 (La.6/26/09), .
Williams v. Ruben Residential Properties, LLC 58 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Guillory v. Lee, 2009-0075 (La.6/26/09), , and citations therein.
Lozier v. Estate of Elmer 64 So. 3d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075 (La.2009), .
Jackie Dauzart, Ind., Etc. v. Safeway Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/26/09), (citations omitted).
August F. Tjon v. Dr. Steve Fitzgerald La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/26/09), : The role of an appellate court in reviewing a general damages award, one which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude, is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.
Hoagboon v. Cannon 54 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
22:1892(B)(1); Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075, p. 30 (La.6/26/09), .
Henry Adam Baltazar, Etc. v. Dennis R. Wolinski La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Baltazar v. Wolinski 53 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“An appellate court, in reviewing a jury’s factual conclusions with regard to special damages, must satisfy a two-step process based on the record as a whole: there must be no reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s conclusions, and the finding must be clearly wrong.” Guillory v. Lee, 09-75, p. 16 (La.6/26/09), .
Lastrapes v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 51 So. 3d 659 La. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075 at p. 32 (La.6/26/09), .
Nolan v. Mabray 51 So. 3d 665 La. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075 (La.6/26/09), -17 (citing Perkins, supra).
Carolann Downing v. John Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/26/09), the supreme court reiterated that pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 2324.1, the trial court has “great discretion” in assessing damages and that the assessment of damages is “a determination of fact .
Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/26/09), (citations omitted).
Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 49 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-75, p. 15 (La.6/26/09), (citations omitted).
Nicol E. Hannie v. Ray Allen Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Hannie v. Guidry 48 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
It is well settled that the assessment of damages is a fact determination “entitled to great deference on review.” Guillory v. Lee, 09-75, p. 14 (La.6/26/09), .
Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 2009-1869, pp. 7-9 (La.3/16/10), (citing Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075 at p. 14, ; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 at p. 6, ).
Richardson v. Geico Indemnity Co. 48 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075 (La.6/26/09), , 1111 n. 5.
Glynn P. Gremillion v. Anita Grimes Gremillion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Gremillion v. Gremillion 43 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-75 (La.6/26/09), .
Defraites v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 44 So. 3d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Compare Guillory v. Lee, 2009-0075, p. 5 n. 5 (La.6/26/09), , 1111 n. 5.
Eileen Hope-Kidd v. Elizabeth Stewart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Barbara Raymond v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/26/09), - 1118: It is well-settled that a judge or jury is given great discretion in its assessment of quantum, both general and special damages.
Virginia Peoples, Et Ux. v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/26/09), -17, the Louisiana Supreme Court offered the following guidance with regard to the appellate standard of review of damage awards: It is well-settled that a judge .
Raymond v. Government Employees Insurance 40 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
| iSThe supreme court recently reiterated the principles of appellate review of damages in Guillory v. Lee, 09-75, pp. 14-16 (La.6/26/09), , 1116-1118: It is well-settled that a judge or jury is given great discretion in its assessment of quantum, both general and special damages.
HOPE-KIDD v. Stewart 40 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-75 (La.6/26/09), .
Peoples v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. 38 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Guillory v. Lee, 09-75, p. 14 (La.6/26/09), -17 , the Louisiana Supreme Court offered the following guidance with regard to the appellate standard of review of damage awards: It is well-settled that a judge ...
James Lee Bancroft, Et Ux. v. Mitchell Offshore Marine, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-75 (La.6/26/09)
Bancroft v. Mitchell Offshore Marine, LLC 44 So. 3d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-75 (La.6/26/09), .
Rebel Electric, LLC v. Jacobs Builders, Inc. 34 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
6/26/09), ; Cosman v. Cabrera, XXXX-XXXX, p. 10 n.7 (La.
Nancy Taylor v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Taylor v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 33 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-75 (La.6/26/09), .
Haik v. Allstate Insurance Co. 39 So. 3d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
art. 2324.1; Guillory v. Lee, 2009-0075, p. 14, (La.6/26/09), .
Scott Ferguson v. Loewer Powersports & Equipment La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Ferguson v. LOEWER POWERSPORTS & EQUIPMENT 33 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-75, p. 14-16 (La.6/26/09), -17 .
Philip Smith v. University Animal Clinic, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Smith v. University Animal Clinic, Inc. 30 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-75, p. 14 (La.6/26/09), .
Savage v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 33 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075 (La.6/26/09), -7 .
Cindy Young v. Irvin T. Joy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Donald R. Alexander v. Ira M. Tate La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/26/09), the supreme court reiterated the long-held tenet that a jury has “great discretion” in assessing damages and that a jury’s assessment of damages is “a determination of fact” which is “entitled to great deference on review.” Accordingly, when reviewing general damage awards, our role is to review the trier o
Alexander v. Tate 30 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Damages Recently, in Guillory v. Lee, 09-75, p. 14 (La.6/26/09), , the supreme court reiterated the long-held tenet that a jury has “great discretion” in assessing damages and that a jury’s assessment of damages is “a determination of fact” which is “entitled to great deference on review.” Accordingly, when reviewing general damage awards, our role is to review the trier of f
Young v. Joy 30 So. 3d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee, 09-75, p. 14 (La.6/26/09), -17 .
James Jason, III v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009