Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ledford v. New Orleans Saints, 19 So. 3d 466.
-
State Of Louisiana Versus
La. 2020
10/16/09), (claims of “ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are not cognizable on collateral review pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Frin Wayne Coward
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
(citing State v. Thomas, 08-2912 La.10/16/09); ).
-
State of Louisiana v. Simuel Shaw Jr
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
10/16/09), (claims of “ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are not cognizable on collateral review pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Will Antonio Celestine
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
10/16/09), (“relator’s claims that the court imposed an excessive sentence and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are not cognizable on collateral review”) (emphasis added).
- State v. Common 257 So. 3d 177 La. 2018
- State ex rel. Magee v. State 254 So. 3d 692 La. 2018
- State of Louisiana v. Roderick Jermaine Cawthorne, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- State v. Cawthorne 257 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State ex rel. Akers v. State 252 So. 3d 461 La. 2018
- State ex rel. Vines v. State 244 So. 3d 434 La. 2018
- State ex rel. Woods v. State 242 So. 3d 557 La. 2018
- State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State ex rel. Wise v. State 238 So. 3d 973 La. 2018
-
State ex rel. Randolph v. State
237 So. 3d 497
La. 2018
10/16/09), ; State v. Cotton , 09-2397 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Adam Comeaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Article 930.3 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, which enumerates the grounds upon which post-conviction relief may be granted, “‘provides no basis for review of claims of excessiveness or other sentencing error post-conviction.’” State v. Thomas, 08–2912 (La.10/16/09); (quoting State ex rel.
-
State v. Comeaux
239 So. 3d 920
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/16/09), (quoting State ex rel.
- State ex rel. Brandon v. State 235 So. 3d 1092 La. 2018
- State v. Hanes 230 So. 3d 201 La. 2017
- State ex rel. Davenport v. State 223 So. 3d 522 La. 2017
- State of Louisiana v. Robert N. Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- State v. Green 248 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State ex rel. Lacombe v. State 220 So. 3d 1292 La. 2017
- State ex rel. Harrison v. State 215 So. 3d 216 La. 2017
- State ex rel. Lancaster v. State 215 So. 3d 219 La. 2017
- State ex rel. Cravanas v. State 208 So. 3d 366 La. 2017
-
State v. Davis
208 So. 3d 869
La. 2017
10/16/09), (claims of “ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are not cognizable on collateral review pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
- State ex rel. Gibson v. State 207 So. 3d 396 La. 2016
-
State of Louisiana v. William Chester Farry Jr. AKA William Chester Farry AKA William C. Farry AKA William …
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
See State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), (“relator’s claims that the court imposed an excessive sentence and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are not cognizable on collateral review”) (emphasis added).
-
State v. Farry
207 So. 3d 436
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
10/16/09), (“relator’s claims that the court imposed an excessive sentence and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are not cognizable on collateral review”) (emphasis added).
- State v. Welch 205 So. 3d 907 La. 2016
- State ex rel. Henderson v. State 203 So. 3d 1030 La. 2016
- State ex rel. Carline v. State 203 So. 3d 233 La. 2016
- State ex rel. Guidry v. State 203 So. 3d 219 La. 2016
- State ex rel. Obey v. State 201 So. 3d 882 La. 2016
- State ex rel. Foster v. State 200 So. 3d 361 La. 2016
- State ex rel. Anthony v. State 200 So. 3d 810 La. 2016
-
State ex rel. Dugar v. State
198 So. 3d 1172
La. 2016
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State ex rel. Ward v. State
193 So. 3d 146
La. 2016
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), ; State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State ex rel. Fox v. State
193 So. 3d 137
La. 2016
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State ex rel. Walker v. State
191 So. 3d 1019
La. 2016
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State v. Gibson
192 So. 3d 132
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
10/16/09), (quoting State ex rel.
-
State ex rel. Hongo v. State
184 So. 3d 1275
La. 2016
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), ; State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State ex rel. Butler v. State
184 So. 3d 10
La. 2016
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), ; State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State ex rel. Munson v. State
182 So. 3d 950
La. 2016
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), ; State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State ex rel. Bergeron v. State
180 So. 3d 1278
La. 2015
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State ex rel. Marigny v. State
178 So. 3d 981
La. 2015
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), ; State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State ex rel. Peterson v. State
181 So. 3d 694
La. 2015
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), ; State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State ex rel. Alfonso v. State
177 So. 3d 1054
La. 2015
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ., See also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), ; State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State v. Brown
175 So. 3d 957
La. 2015
Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), ; State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La.10/15/10), ; State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), .
-
State v. Paulson
177 So. 3d 360
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Thomas, 08-2912 (La.10/16/09), (“relator’s claims that the court imposed an excessive Imsentence and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are not cognizable on collateral review”) (emphasis added).