Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 45 So. 3d 991.

131 citing documents.

Duane G. Tower v. Conocophillips Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Daniel P. Martin v. DQSI, LLC, Shelly S. Stubbs and Michael A. Stubbs La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Justin Luke King v. Debusk Services Group, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Montalbano v. Persich 274 So. 3d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Pizzolato v. Grier 275 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Alvin J. Chaisson v. Colby Garrett Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Expert Riser Solutions, LLC v. Techcrane Int'l, LLC 270 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
ASI Fed. Credit Union v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Syndicate 1414 Subscribing to Policy FINFR1503374 259 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Hoffman v. Theriot 249 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In re Jarrell 240 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/06/10), , 996 (citing Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of LouisianaState University , , 345 (La.
Harris v. Breaud 243 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc. 241 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Feingerts v. D'Anna 237 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/06/10), , 996 (citing Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University , , 345 (La.
Newsome v. City of Bastrop 245 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Benson v. State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Office of Alcohol & Tobacco Control 227 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Bihm v. Deca Systems, Inc. 226 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Moore v. Chevron USA 222 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
7/6/10), ; Rebstock v. Seismic Exchange, Inc., 13-0540, 2013 WL 5915140 , p.2 (La.
Raymond Charles Cressy v. Huffines Hyundai McKinney, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
7/6/10), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 03-1424 (La.
Alexander v. La. State Board of Private Investigator Examiners 211 So. 3d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Guidry v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Co. 213 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Coleman v. Querbes Co. No. 1 218 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
7/6/10), ; Blevins v. Long Trusts, 49,605 (La.App.
Steven Trahan v. Bp America Production Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Trahan v. BP America Production Co. 209 So. 3d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Trans Pacific Interactive, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp. 203 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Arnouville v. Crowe 203 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Garcia v. Lewis 197 So. 3d 738 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Even' after the 1996 and 1997 amendments to Art. 966 that elevated summary judgment from disfavored to favored status, 3 the courts have continued to hold that the procedure is “seldom appropriate for determinations based on subjective facts of motivé, intent, good faith, knowledge, or malice.” Hogg v. Chevron USA, 2009-2632 (La.7/6/10), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 (La.4/14/04), ; Fair Farms Inc. v. Holt, 48,246 (La.App.
Daniel v. Minnard 196 So. 3d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632 (La.7/06/10), ; Alcorn v. City of Baton Rouge, Baton Rouge Police Department, 03-2682 (La.1/16/04), ; Doe v. Jones, 02-2581 (La.App.
Caballero v. Keystone Customs, L.L.C. 188 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632 (La.7/6/10), .
Calhoun v. RCSR, LLC 185 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Even after the 1996 and 1997 amendments to Art. 966 that elevated summary judgment from disfavored to favored status; 2 the courts have continued to hold that the procedure is “seldom appropriate for determinations based on subjective facts of motive, intent, good faith, knowledge, or malice.” Hogg v. Chevron USA, 2009-2632 (La.7/6/10), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 (La.4/14/04), ; Fair Farms Inc. v. Holt, 48,246 (La.App.
Estate of Shelli Belaire (Judge J. Ayo O/B/O G. M. A.) v. Crawfish Town USA La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Estate of Belaire v. Crawfish Town USA 182 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
STANDARD OF REVIEW “Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo, using the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether' summary judgment is appropriate.” Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, p. 5 (La.7/6/10), .
M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government 182 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, 09-2635, p. 6 (La.7/6/10), .
MR Pittman Group, LLC v. Plaquemines Parish Government 182 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
But see Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, p. 6 (La.7/6/10), (“When prescription is raised by motion for summary judgment, review is de novo, using the same criteria used by the district court in determining whether summary judgment is appropriate.”); MR Pittman, LLC, 15-0860, p. 11, 182 So.3d at 320.
Meiko Prevo v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections Division of Probation and … La. 2015
7/6/10), (quoting Crump v. Sabine River Auth., 98-2326 (La.
BFH v. First National Bank USA 181 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hogg v. Chevron USA, 09-2632 (La.7/6/10), .
Adcock v. Wooten 180 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2635 (La.7/6/10), .
Denham Homes, LLC v. Teche Federal Bank 182 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632 (La.7/6/10), .
Porter v. Southern Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, LLC 165 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Even after the 1996 and 1997 amendments to Art. 966 that elevated summary judgment from disfavored to favored status, 2 the courts have continued to hold that the procedure is “seldom appropriate for determinations based on subjective facts of motive, intent, good faith, knowledge, or malice.” Hogg v. Chevron USA, 2009-2632 (La.7/6/10), fn.
Kovach v. Hancock Bank of Louisiana 164 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, p. 5 (La.7/6/10), .
Gloria M. Ned v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
7/6/10), Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 09-2368, 09-2371 (La.
Ned v. Union Pacific Corp. 176 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Given, the subsequent ' rulings in Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, 09-2635 (La.7/6/10), ; Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 09-2368, 09-2371 (La.10/19/10), ; and Bernard v. City of Marksville, 14—730 (La.App.
Blevins v. Long Trusts 162 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
art. 3493; Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 2009-2632 (La.7/6/10), ; Anderson v. Bossier Parish Police Jury, 45,639 (La.App.2d Cir.12/15/10), .
Alphonse J. Credeur v. Richard Dickie" Latiolais, in His Capacity as Secretary- Treasurer for the Acadia Parish Police … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632 (La.7/6/10)
Credeur v. Latiolais 158 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632 (La.7/6/10), .
Kelley v. General Insurance Co. of America 168 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 2009-2632 (La.7/6/10), .
Illes v. State ex rel. Division of Administration 168 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 2009-2632, p. 7 (La.7/6/10), ; Quality Gas Products, Inc. v. Bank One Corp., 2003-1859, p. 4 (La.App.
Glenn Bernard v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
7/6/10), the supreme court further explained the inquiry as to whether there is continuous tortious conduct “is essentially a conduct-based one, asking whether the tortfeasor perpetuates the injury through overt, persistent, and ongoing acts.” The Hogg court stated: [C]ourts [look] to the alleged injury-produ
Bernard v. City of Marksville 154 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, p. 16 (La.7/6/10), , the supreme court further explained the inquiry as to whether there is continuous tor-tious conduct “is essentially a conduct-based one, asking whether the tortfeasor perpetuates the injury through overt, persistent, and ongoing acts.” The Hogg court stated: [Cjourts [look] to the alleged injury-producing cond
Scott v. Zaheri 157 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The inquiry as to whether there is continuous tortious conduct “is essentially a conduct-based one, asking whether the tortfeasor perpetuates the injury through overt, persistent, and ongoing acts.” Hogg v. Chevron USA Inc., 09-2632, p. 16 (La.7/6/10), .
Southern Acadiana Services, LLC v. Phonesaga Phyarath La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632 (La.7/6/10)