Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCormic v. Rider, 27 So. 3d 277.

23 citing documents.

Brittany Nicole Sharp v. Joshua Malone Jordan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
2/ 12/ 10), ( per curiam).
John Pickney Morgan v. Feliciana Lopez Morgan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Joseph Aiavolasiti Kott v. Ashley Kott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Anthony D. Merrells v. Olivia F. Dotray La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
2/12/10), Mercer v. Mercer, 52,101 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Bell-Brayboy La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
2/12/10), Atkins v. Atkins, 47,563 (La.
Bernard v. Allen 272 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2/12/10), , 279-80, citing Smith with approval and reinstating the trial court judgment awarding joint custody to the child's biological parents and grandmother (who was also the child's adopted mother).
State ex rel. Department of Children & Family Services, Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Bushman v. Knapp 216 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Ferrand v. Ferrand 221 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Jeremy George, Et Ux. v. Robbie Dugas, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2/12/10), La.Civ.Code art. 134.
George v. Dugas 188 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2985 , 77 L.Ed.2d 614 (1983); McCormic v. Rider, 09-2584 (La.2/12/10), ; La.Civ.Code art. 134.
Tracie F. v. Francisco D. 174 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
2985 , 77 L.Ed.2d 614 (1983); McCormic v. Rider, 09-2584, pp. 3-4 (La.2/12/10), (citing Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), ); La.
Wilson v. Wilson 170 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
McCormic v. Rider, 09-2584 (La.2/12/10), , (La.App.
State in the Interest of P. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State ex rel. of P.T. 159 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
McCormic v. Rider, 09-2584, pp. 3-4 (La.2/12/10), .
Hanks v. Hanks 140 So. 3d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
• “[E]ach child custody case must be viewed in light of its own particular set of facts and circumstances, with the paramount goal of reaching a decision that is in the best interest of the child.” McCormic v. Rider, 09-2584, pp. 3-4 (La.2/12/10), ( (La.App.
Ramirez v. Ramirez 124 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“The primary consideration and prevailing inquiry is whether the custody arrangement is in the best interest of the child.” McCormic v. Rider, 09-2584, pp. 3—4 (La.2/12/10), (citing Ay- *18 ans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577 (La.2/6/98), ).
Atkins v. Atkins 106 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
McCormic v. Rider, 09-2584 (La.02/12/10), ; Coleman, supra; Mayo v. Henson, 42,250 (La.App.2d Cir.05/09/07), .
Duplessy v. Duplessy 102 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
McCormic v. Rider, 09-2584, p. 3 (La.2/12/10), .
McFall v. Armstrong 75 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
McCormic v. Rider, *39 09-2584 (La.2/12/10); , citing, (La.App.
Gerhardt v. Gerhardt 70 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
McCormic v. Rider, 2009-2584 (La.02/12/10), .
Mia Angelinn Cutrera Dooley v. Donald Jude Dooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Dooley v. Dooley 55 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
McCormic v. Rider, 09-2584 (La.2/12/10), .
In Re Melancon 62 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 133, a nonparent is only entitled to custody upon a showing that “an award of joint custody or of sole custody to either parent would result in substantial harm to the child.” McCormic v. *764 Rider, 09-2584, p. 3 (La.2/12/10), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by