Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Strother, 49 So. 3d 372.

117 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jonathan L.citizen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. D. R. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Larry Joseph McKithern La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. McKithern 93 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Strother, 09-2357, pp. 10-11 (La.10/22/10), .
State of Louisiana v. Terry L. Clarkson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Clarkson 86 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Strother, 09-2357, pp. 10-11 (La.10/22/10), .
State of Louisiana v. Michael D. Patterson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Patterson 83 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Strother, 09-2357, pp. 10-11 (La.10/22/10), .
State v. Murray 86 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
3d Cir.10/07/09), , decision aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 09-2357 (La.10/12/10), .
State of Louisiana v. Avis Renea Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Trahan 101 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See also State v. Strother, 09-2357 (La.10/22/10), .
State of Louisiana v. Shawn Shelton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. White 74 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Accordingly, the relevant question before us is whether, on the evidence presented at trial, “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Strother, 2009-2357, p. 10 (La.10/22/10), (quoting Jackson, 443 U.S. at 319 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Shelton 75 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Strother, 09-2357, pp. 10-11 (La.10/22/10), .
State of Louisiana v. Courtney Paul Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Darrell W. Westmoreland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Westmoreland 63 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
We note that the supreme court recently reiterated the appropriateness of both general and specific deterrence as a sentencing consideration in State v. Strother, 09-2357 (La.10/22/10), .