Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. LH, 36 So. 3d 229.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jose M. Sagastume La. 2023
    5/21/10), the Fifth Circuit found it sufficed that counsel provided reasons for the challenge and then used a peremptory strike on the juror to preserve the issue for appeal without a formal objection.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Gilbert J. Burciaga La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
    5/21/10), the defendant argued that the trial court improperly denied the defense’s challenges for cause as to two prospective jurors.
  • State of Louisiana v. George McKinney, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana Versus Jose M. Sagastume La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    05/21/10), State v. Pinion, 06-2346 (La.
  • State v. Eiermann 224 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Brown 173 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 10/27/09) , , writ denied, 09-2596 (La.5/21/10), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Hopkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 11/4/09), writ denied, 09-2577 (La.5/21/10), and our review of the defendant’s sentence is restricted to his bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State of Louisiana v. Eldridge Tezano, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Philip A. Geraci La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 11/4/09), writ denied, 09-2577 (La.5/21/10), and our review of the defendant’s sentence is restricted to his bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance L. Sinegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 11/4/09), writ denied, 09-2577 (La.5/21/10), and our review of the defendant‘s sentence is restricted to his bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State v. Sinegal 97 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 11/4/09) , , writ denied, 09-2577 (La.5/21/10), , and our review of the defendant’s sentence is restricted to his bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State of Louisiana v. George Roy Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 11/4/09), writ denied, 09-2577 (La.5/21/10), and our review of the defendant‟s sentence is restricted to his bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 11/4/09), writ denied, 09-2577 (La.5/21/10), and our review of the defendant’s sentence is restricted to his bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 11/4/09) , , writ denied, 09-2577 (La.5/21/10), , and our review of the defendant’s sentence is restricted to his bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth K. Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    5/21/10), and our review of the defendant’s sentence is restricted to his bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State v. Prejean 50 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 11/4/09) , , turit denied, 09-2577 (La.5/21/10), , and our review of the defendant’s sentence is restricted to his bare claim of excessiveness.