Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 22 So. 3d 205.

25 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Don C. Woods La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
App. 4 Cir. 9/16/09), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Jacob Martin Michot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
4 Cir. 9/16/09), writ denied, 09-2263 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Montreal Davis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Wesley Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 9/16/09), writ denied, 09-2263 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Marie Alfred A/K/A Elizabeth Alfred La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 9/16/09), writ denied, 09-2263 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Chad M. Vidrine La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State v. Jones 214 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4 Cir. 9/16/09), (failure to object to unrecorded bench conferences did not preserve issues for appeal).
State v. Falgout 198 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 9/16/09), * 211 , The defendant has made no showing that the jury’s finding is contrary to the evidepce.
State v. Sandifer 195 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Wells 191 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 9/16/09), (An appellate court may not consider evidence which is outside the record).
State v. Hunter 176 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Canales 156 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/16/09), ; State v. Huckabay, 00-1082, pp. 32-33 (La.App.
State v. Thomas 139 So. 3d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/16/09), , (“an appellate court may not consider evidence which is outside the record.”) Our review of the record shows that the State did not carry its burden of proving an interruption to the time limitation of La.
State v. Heine 140 So. 3d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/16/09) , , writ denied, 09-2263 (La.4/16/10), ("[A]n appellate court may not consider evidence which is outside the record.”).
State v. Jordan 118 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 9/16/09), , (“an appellate court may not consider evidence which is outside the record.”) Our review of the record shows that the State did not carry its burden of proving an interruption to the time limitation of La.
State v. Bentley 116 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 9/16/09), ; State v. Sylvester, 10-1021, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 9/16/09) , ; State v. Huckabay, 2000-1082 (La.App.
State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 9/16/09), ; State v. Huckabay, 2000-1082 (La.App.
State v. Davis 147 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pleasant 102 So. 3d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 9/16/09), ; State v. Huckabay, 00-1082, p. 33 (La.App.
State v. Guity 97 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 9/16/09) , ; State v. Huckabay, 2000-1082 (La.App.
State v. Green 69 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 9/16/09) , , writ denied, 2009-2263 (La.4/16/10), .
State v. Green 69 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hathorn 63 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 9/16/09) , writ denied, 2009-2263 (La.4/16/10), (fact finder’s credibility determination is entitled to great weight and should not be disturbed unless it is contrary to the evidence).