Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lawrence, 47 So. 3d 1003.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kentrell Howard La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. Dana Jamariyaa Combs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 8/25/10), in which a remand was granted, and State v. Paddio, 02-722 (La.
State v. Randolph 219 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Luzzo 214 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Castro 206 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hunter 176 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Hartford 162 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 8/25/10), (“Suffice it to say that intermediate appellate judges, just like a trial judge, are ‘not at liberty to *83 ignore the controlling jurisprudence of superior courts.’ ”)”).
State v. Edwards 133 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 8/25/10), (“the antithesis of an intentional act is an accidental act”).
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hankton 122 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
8/25/10), (“Suffice it to say that intermediate appellate judges, just like a trial judge, are ‘not at liberty to ignore the controlling jurisprudence of superior courts.’ ”) Consequently, we hold that we can grant Mr. Hankton no relief under this, his first, assignment of error.
State v. Lawrence 91 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 8/25/10), ; State v. Gibson, 99-2827, p. 12 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 8/25/10), State v. Sumrall, 09-1216 (La.App.