Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hamilton, 36 So. 3d 209.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Zachary Hunt La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Darnell T. McKey La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Ray Allen Parker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Riles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
5/11/10), as follows: In the first tier, there is no seizure or Fourth Amendment concern during mere communication with police officers and citizens where there is no coercion or detention.
State Of Louisiana v. Tony L. Anderson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
5/ 11/ 10), ( Relevant inquiry of a seizure is whether and at what point a defendant is seized for constitutional purposes.).
State v. Fields 151 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hamilton, 09-2205, p. 4 (La.5/11/10), -213 .
State v. Ulmer 116 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hamilton, 09-2205, p. 3 (La.5/11/10), (citation omitted).
State v. King 109 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hamilton, 2009-2205, p. 3 (La.5/11/10), (citation omitted).
State v. Butler 101 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hamilton, 09-2205, p. 4 (La.5/11/10), ; State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), .
State v. Golden 95 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Const. art. 1, § 5 occurs when police, without reasonable suspicion, either actually stop an individual or create a situation wherein an actual stop of the individual is “imminent.” (1993); see also State v. Hamilton, 2009-2205, p. 3 (La.5/11/10), (when a citizen is actually stopped without reasonable cause or when a stop without reasonable cause is “imminent,” the right to be left alone is violated, rendering unlawful any resultant seizure of abandoned property).
State v. Lewis 85 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1684 ; State v. Hamilton, 2009-2205, p. 3 (La.5/11/10), .
State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Fisher , 97-1133, pp. 4-5, 720 So.2d at 1182-1183 , In State v. Hamilton, 2009-2205 (La.5/11/10), , the court held that police officers did not seize the defendant, for constitutional purposes, when they called to him; after initially walking away, the defendant chose to walk back to the officers and removed his hands from his pockets at the officers’ request.
State v. Williams 74 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hamilton, 09-2205, p. 4 (La.5/11/10), .
State v. Francis 60 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1684 ; State v. Hamilton, 2009-2205, p. 3 (La.5/11/10), .