Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lange v. Orleans Levee District, 56 So. 3d 925.

28 citing documents.

Alex Mikkelsen v. Flood Protection Authority - East La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Monroe Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board v. Reginald Brown and the City of Monroe La. 2025
Nha Do v. Department of Safety & Permits La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
11/30/10), (observing that “longtime employment and lack of prior discipline may be mitigating factors in the determination of an employee’s punishment”).
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company, D/B/A Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and Hmo Louisiana, Inc. … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Leslie McDaniel v. DOTD La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
11/ 30/ 10), due process requires a reasonable opportunity to respond to the charges lodged against an individual.
Roy Neely v. Department of Fire La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Rhett Charles v. New Orleans Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Pemella Williams v. the Board of Supervisors, of the Louisiana Community & Technical College Systems La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Williams v. Bd. of Supervisors 272 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Rivet v. Dep't of Police 258 So. 3d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Cunningham v. New Orleans Police Dep't 257 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Dustin Bonial v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
11/30/10), the supreme court explained: “‘Cause’ for termination of an employee includes conduct prejudicial to the public service involved or detrimental to its efficient operation.” The repugnant nature of the subject term, alone, would seem to require no further inquiry under this standard.
Bonial v. City of Alexandria 250 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/30/10), , 934, the supreme court explained: " 'Cause' *1045 for termination of an employee includes conduct prejudicial to the public service involved or detrimental to its efficient operation."
Lewis v. Dep't of Human Servs. 242 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Kasha Lapointe v. Vermilion Parish School Board 173 So. 3d 1152 La. 2015
Lange v. Orleans Levee Dist., 10-140, p. 6 (La.1/30/10), (citing Loudermill, supra).
McMasters v. Department of Police 172 So. 3d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Lange v. Orleans Levee District, 10-0140, p. 17 (La.11/30/10), .
City of Eunice v. Eunice Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Kasha Lapointe v. Vermilion Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
11/30/10), (citing Cleveland Bd.
LaPointe v. Vermilion Parish School Board 158 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Louisiana Supreme Court recognizes that “due process entitles an employee threatened with termination to notice of the charges lodged against him, and an opportunity to tell his side of the story before termination.” Lange v. Orleans Levee Dist., 10-140, p. 6 (La.11/30/10), (citing Cleveland Bd.
Callie Abshire v. City of Kaplan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Hurst v. Department of Police 146 So. 3d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Const, art. X, § 8(A); Lange v. Orleans Levee Dist, 10-0140, p. 2, n. 2 (La.l 1/30/10), .
Sumling v. Department of Health 144 So. 3d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
11/30/10), [citations omitted].
Moore v. City of Baton Rouge 146 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Lange v. Orleans Levee District, 2010-0140 (La.11/30/10), .
Ferris v. Department of Police 129 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“ ‘[S]ym-pathy is not a legal standard.’ ” Id., quoting Lange v. Orleans Levee Dist., 10-0140, p. 17 (La.11/30/10), .
Regis v. Department of Police 121 So. 3d 665 La. 2013
Const, art. X, § 8(A); Lange v. Orleans Levee Dist., 10-0140, p. 2 n. 2 (La.11/30/10); , 928 n. 2.
Kaylin Renee Celestine, Etc. v. Brenda Dugas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Byrd v. Department of Police 109 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Lange v. Orleans Levee District, 10-0140, p. 17 (La.11/30/10), .
Chinh Nguyen v. Department of Police 72 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See Lange v. Orleans Levee District, 10-0140, p. 17 (La.11/30/10), .