Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nolan v. Mabray, 51 So. 3d 665.
-
Green v. New Orleans Recreation Development Commission
220 So. 3d 165
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/30/10), (holding that “the issue of mailing is a factual issue to be decided by the trial court”).
- Contreras v. Vesper 214 So. 3d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
Moreland v. Gungor
163 So. 3d 825
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Dr. Gungor agrees the standard is manifest error, Nolan v. Mabray, 2010-0373 (La.11/30/10), , but submits that given the widely divergent testimony, the credibility determinations and the trial court’s wide discretion, 'there is no manifest error.
- Borgnemouth Realty Co. v. Parish of St. Bernard 141 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
Handy v. City of Kenner
97 So. 3d 539
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Nolan v. Mabray, 10-0373, p. 10 (La.11/30/10)
-
State ex rel. K.J.
71 So. 3d 557
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Nolan v. Mabray, 10-373, pp. 9-10 (La.11/30/10), .
-
State Ex Rel. Kj
71 So. 3d 557
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Nolan v. Mabray, 10-373, pp. 9-10 (La.11/30/10), .
-
Manh An Bui v. Farmer's Insurance Exchange
68 So. 3d 656
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Johnson , 11-0476 at p. 2, 60 So.3d at 607 -08 [citing Nolan v. Mabray, 10-0373, p. 8 (La.11/30/10), ].
-
Jimenez v. OMNI ROYAL ORLEANS HOTEL
66 So. 3d 528
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Nolan v. Mabray, 10-0373, p. 10 (La.11/30/10), ; Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C., 10-277, p. 18 (La.App.
-
Johnson v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.
60 So. 3d 607
La. 2011
22:1335 in relation to whether an insurer had notified the insured of its willingness to renew the policy by mailing the insured the policy renewal notice in the case of Nolan v. Mabray, 2010-0373 (La.11/30/10), .
-
State ex rel. W.H.
62 So. 3d 839
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Nolan v. Mabray, 10-373, pp. 9-10 (La.11/30/2010), .
-
State Ex Rel. Wh
62 So. 3d 839
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Nolan v. Mabray, 10-373, pp. 9-10 (La.11/30/2010), .
-
BRUMBERGER v. Touro Infirmary
63 So. 3d 293
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Nolan v. Mabray, 2010-373, p. 9 (La.11/30/10), .
-
FIA Card Services, N.A. v. Weaver
62 So. 3d 709
La. 2011
11/30/10), (Mailing was sufficiently proven by testimony that insurance company sent mailings automatically on a certain date, and there was no breakdown in the mailing system on that *719 date); Marsh v. First USA Bank, N.A., 103 F.Supp.2d 909, 918-19 (N.D.Tex.2000) (Credit card company employees testified that inserts includin