Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nolan v. Mabray, 51 So. 3d 665.

14 citing documents.

  • Green v. New Orleans Recreation Development Commission 220 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    11/30/10), (holding that “the issue of mailing is a factual issue to be decided by the trial court”).
  • Contreras v. Vesper 214 So. 3d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Moreland v. Gungor 163 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Dr. Gungor agrees the standard is manifest error, Nolan v. Mabray, 2010-0373 (La.11/30/10), , but submits that given the widely divergent testimony, the credibility determinations and the trial court’s wide discretion, 'there is no manifest error.
  • Borgnemouth Realty Co. v. Parish of St. Bernard 141 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Handy v. City of Kenner 97 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Nolan v. Mabray, 10-0373, p. 10 (La.11/30/10)
  • State ex rel. K.J. 71 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Nolan v. Mabray, 10-373, pp. 9-10 (La.11/30/10), .
  • State Ex Rel. Kj 71 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    Nolan v. Mabray, 10-373, pp. 9-10 (La.11/30/10), .
  • Manh An Bui v. Farmer's Insurance Exchange 68 So. 3d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Johnson , 11-0476 at p. 2, 60 So.3d at 607 -08 [citing Nolan v. Mabray, 10-0373, p. 8 (La.11/30/10), ].
  • Jimenez v. OMNI ROYAL ORLEANS HOTEL 66 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Nolan v. Mabray, 10-0373, p. 10 (La.11/30/10), ; Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C., 10-277, p. 18 (La.App.
  • Johnson v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 60 So. 3d 607 La. 2011
    22:1335 in relation to whether an insurer had notified the insured of its willingness to renew the policy by mailing the insured the policy renewal notice in the case of Nolan v. Mabray, 2010-0373 (La.11/30/10), .
  • State ex rel. W.H. 62 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Nolan v. Mabray, 10-373, pp. 9-10 (La.11/30/2010), .
  • State Ex Rel. Wh 62 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    Nolan v. Mabray, 10-373, pp. 9-10 (La.11/30/2010), .
  • BRUMBERGER v. Touro Infirmary 63 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Nolan v. Mabray, 2010-373, p. 9 (La.11/30/10), .
  • FIA Card Services, N.A. v. Weaver 62 So. 3d 709 La. 2011
    11/30/10), (Mailing was sufficiently proven by testimony that insurance company sent mailings automatically on a certain date, and there was no breakdown in the mailing system on that *719 date); Marsh v. First USA Bank, N.A., 103 F.Supp.2d 909, 918-19 (N.D.Tex.2000) (Credit card company employees testified that inserts includin