Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Km, 49 So. 3d 460.

14 citing documents.

State ex rel. R.P. 150 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/29/10) , , we affirmed an adjudication for the delinquent act of carrying a concealed weapon in a purse pursuant to La.
State ex rel. C.J. 153 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/29/10), , 463-464, we must find that the evidence is sufficient to support the juvenile’s adjudication on both counts of simple battery.
State ex rel. X.F. 143 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State ex rel. K.D. 140 So. 3d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 4 Cir. 9/29/10), , this Court set forth the standard of review in a juvenile delinquency case as follows: *186 In evaluating the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found th
State ex rel. A.W. 137 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/29/10), , 463-464, this Court set forth the standard of review in a juvenile delinquency case as follows: In evaluating the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have foun
State ex rel. J.D. 129 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State ex rel. A.D. 95 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 9/29/10), , 463-464, this Court set forth the standard of review in a juvenile delinquency case as follows: In evaluating the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have foun
State ex rel. T.M. 88 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State in Interest of La 85 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Pleasant 66 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Cj 63 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State ex rel. D.D. 65 So. 3d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 9/29/10), , 463-464, as follows: |3In evaluating the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State ex rel. C.J. 63 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State ex rel. D.R. 50 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 9/29/10) , (Bonin, J., concurring).