Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 51 So. 3d 827.

21 citing documents.

State v. Jones 214 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Falgout 198 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Monroe 198 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Sandifer 195 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Tucker 170 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Simonson 163 So. 3d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 11/10/10) , : Even where a prosecutor’s argument has exceeded the scope of art. 774 or is deemed to be improper, a reviewing court should credit the good sense and fair-mindedness of the jurors who have heard the evidence.
State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 11/10/10), (quoting State v. Clark, 01-2087, p. 15 (La.App.
State v. Jacques 157 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/10/10), , quoting State v. Clark, 2001-2087, p. 15 (La.App.
State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/10/10), (citing State v. Stewart, 04-2219, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 11/10/10), , 833: Even where a prosecutor’s argument has exceeded the scope of art. 774 or is deemed to be improper, a reviewing court should credit the good sense and fair-mindedness of the jurors who have heard the evidence.
State v. Haynes 144 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Webb 133 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Celestine 131 So. 3d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/10/10), , 833: Even where a prosecutor’s argument has exceeded the scope of art. 774 or is deemed to be improper, a reviewing court should credit the good sense and fairmindedness of the jurors who have heard the evidence.
State v. Augustine 131 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/10/10), , 833: Even where a prosecutor’s argument has exceeded the scope of art. 774 or is deemed to be improper, a reviewing court should credit the good sense and fairmindedness of the jurors who have heard the evidence.
State v. Bailey 126 So. 3d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Henry 102 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Torregano 101 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 11/10/10), , writ denied, 2010-2683 (La.4/25/11); ; State v. Mathieu, 2007-0204, p. 16 (La.App.
State v. Anderson 85 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 11/10/10), , writ denied, 2010-2683 (La.4/25/11), ; State v. Mathieu, 2007-0204, p. 16 (La.App.
State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 11/10/10), , writ denied, 2010-2683 (La.4/25/11), .
State v. Maxwell 83 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 11/10/10), , writ denied, 2010-2683 (La.4/25/11), .