Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vincent, 56 So. 3d 408.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Dillion
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
App. 4 Cir. 1/19/11), the defendant was charged with unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, and a jury found him guilty of the responsive verdict of attempted unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
-
State v. Brazell
245 So. 3d 15
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 1/19/11), , 415 ).
- State v. Gibson 192 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Cureaux 165 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
State v. Sims
123 So. 3d 806
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/19/11), , writ denied, 2011-0315 (La.6/17/11), (no constitutional right to a jury trial exists in multiple bill proceedings because all of the elements necessary to enhance the sentence “can be determined by reviewing the documents submitted in support of the multiple bill of information.”).
-
State v. Hackett
122 So. 3d 1164
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/19/11) , , addressed the issue of jury access in multiple bill hearings as follows: Next, Vincent argues that he was entitled to a jury trial on the issue of his multiple offender status.
- State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
State v. Tatten
116 So. 3d 843
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/19/11), -15 , this Court explained that[:] [T]he Louisiana Constitution of 1974 does not require that the District Attorney institute proceedings by a bill of indictment where the maximum penalty for the charge is less than life imprisonment.
- State v. Taylor 104 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
State v. Rubens
83 So. 3d 30
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 1/19/11), , writ denied, 2011-0315 (La.6/17/11), .
-
State v. Lomax
81 So. 3d 788
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 1/19/11), , 415 citing State v. Smith, 05-0375, pp. 3-5 (La.App.
-
State v. Landfair
70 So. 3d 1061
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 4 Cir. 1/19/11), -15 , this Court explained that [T]he Louisiana Constitution of 1974 does not require that the District Attorney institute proceedings by a bill of indictment where the maximum penalty for the charge is less than life imprisonment.