Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vincent, 56 So. 3d 408.

13 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Dillion La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
    App. 4 Cir. 1/19/11), the defendant was charged with unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, and a jury found him guilty of the responsive verdict of attempted unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
  • State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 1/19/11), , 415 ).
  • State v. Gibson 192 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Cureaux 165 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Sims 123 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/19/11), , writ denied, 2011-0315 (La.6/17/11), (no constitutional right to a jury trial exists in multiple bill proceedings because all of the elements necessary to enhance the sentence “can be determined by reviewing the documents submitted in support of the multiple bill of information.”).
  • State v. Hackett 122 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/19/11) , , addressed the issue of jury access in multiple bill hearings as follows: Next, Vincent argues that he was entitled to a jury trial on the issue of his multiple offender status.
  • State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/19/11), -15 , this Court explained that[:] [T]he Louisiana Constitution of 1974 does not require that the District Attorney institute proceedings by a bill of indictment where the maximum penalty for the charge is less than life imprisonment.
  • State v. Taylor 104 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 1/19/11), , writ denied, 2011-0315 (La.6/17/11), .
  • State v. Lomax 81 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 1/19/11), , 415 citing State v. Smith, 05-0375, pp. 3-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Landfair 70 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    App. 4 Cir. 1/19/11), -15 , this Court explained that [T]he Louisiana Constitution of 1974 does not require that the District Attorney institute proceedings by a bill of indictment where the maximum penalty for the charge is less than life imprisonment.