Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hayes, 75 So. 3d 8.

18 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Gary Allen La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Scott Lingle La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    4 Cir. 9/1/11), (emphasis added), quoting Briede v. Orleans Parish Dist.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Terance Roshell Dawson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    App. 4" Cir. 9/ 1/ 11), writ denied, 2011- 2144 ( La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Timothy P. Roussel La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    App. 4 Cir. 9/1/11), writ denied, 11-2144 (La.
  • State v. Leonard 262 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    4 Cir. 9/1/11), , 12 ; see also La.
  • State v. Cinquemano 257 So. 3d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 9/1/11), , 13 ; La.
  • State v. Papizan 256 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 4 Cir. 9/1/11), , 11, writ denied , 11-2144 (La.
  • State v. Jones 178 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Hayes, 2010-1538, p. 4 (La.App, 4 Cir. 9/1/11), ; see also La.
  • State v. Dixon 146 So. 3d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 9/1/11), (citing Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 405 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Martin 141 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 9/1/11), , writ denied, 11-2144 (La.3/2/12), .
  • State ex rel. K.W. 137 So. 3d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 9/1/11), ; United States v. Taylor, 487 U.S. 326, 336 , 108 S.Ct.
  • State v. Thomas 138 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 9/1/11), (citing Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 405 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gregory 137 So. 3d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 9/1/11), (citing Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 405 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bell 106 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4th Cir.9/1/11), , writ denied, 11-2144 (La.3/2/12), , noted: Because of the severe remedy, a trial court may not quash the formal charges and dismiss them with prejudice when the prosecution’s abusive exercise of its authority simply disrupts a trial court’s conduct of the proceedings or challenges the court’s authority
  • State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 9/1/11), , writ denied, 11-2144 (La.3/2/12), ; see also La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Luther 91 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 9/1/11) , , writ den., 11-2144 (La.3/2/12), .
  • State v. Williams 89 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 9/1/11) , , where this court reversed the trial court’s ruling that quashed the bill of information, finding that the defendant failed to show prejudice from the state’s action.
  • State v. Brown 88 So. 3d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 9/1/11), , writ denied, 11-2144 (La.3/2/12), .