Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Golston, 67 So. 3d 452.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of D.D. La. 2025
7/1/11), (Sex Offender Assessment Panel (SOAP) procedure for sex offenders is “regulatory, rather than criminal.”); State v. Patin, 02-1126 (La.
James Deslonde, Britany Deslonde, and Evan Plauche v. St. Tammany Parish La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.H. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Fanny Farms, LLC, Karen M. Meyers and Kendall J. Meyers v. Plaquemines Parish Government La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. the Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Panel a … La. 2023
7/1/11), the defendants argued that the Sex Offender Assessment Panels (SOAP)(La.
State of Louisiana v. Hunter Fussell La. 2019
David Carver v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety 239 So. 3d 226 La. 2018
State v. Jones 182 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
See Olivieri, supra; State v. Golston, 10-2804 (La.7/1/11), ; State v. I.C.S., 13-1023 (La.7/1/14) .
Eddy Oliver, Oscarlene Nixon, and Mildred Goodwin v. Orleans Parish School Board 156 So. 3d 596 La. 2014
at 732 (citing State v. Golston, 10-2804 (La.7/1/11), ).
State of Louisiana v. Maurice Addison Hawley 149 So. 3d 1211 La. 2014
State v. Collins 125 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In Smith , where like in Mr. Collins’ case, the former limited registration period had not lapsed when the legislature extended the reporting period to that of lifetime, the Court unanimously held, relying upon Olivieri and State v. Golston, 10-2804 (La.7/1/11), , that the lifetime registration as a sex offender requirement is not punishment, is to be applied retroactively, and is not violative of the constitutional prohibitions on ex post facto laws.
State v. Bazile 144 So. 3d 719 La. 2013
Procedural Due Process “Procedural due process requires that before an individual is deprived of a property or liberty right, the individual must be provided with notice and an opportunity to be heard.” State v. Gol-ston, 2010-2804, 16 (La.7/1/11); .
In re Office of Chief Justice, Louisiana Supreme Court 101 So. 3d 9 La. 2012
See State v. Golston, 10-2804, p. 16 (La.7/1/11), ("The fundamental requirement of due process is the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner."); see also In re Warner, 05-1303, p. 58 (La.4/17/09), ("the interest of due process” is served when a party is “notified ...
State v. Trosclair 89 So. 3d 340 La. 2012
§§ 15:560-560.4, see State v. Golston, 10-2804, p. 23 (La.7/1/11), (finding scheme regulatory, rather than criminal, for those sex offenders classified as sexually violent predators or child sexual predators).
Eddie Ray Jackson v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
7/1/11), this court upheld the provisions of La.
Jackson v. State 102 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Most recently, in State v. Golston, 10-2804 (La.7/1/11), , this court upheld the provisions of La.Rev.Stat.
Smith v. State 84 So. 3d 487 La. 2012
Most recently, in State v. Golston, 10-2804 (La.7/1/11), , this court upheld the provisions of La.Rev.Stat.