Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nelson, 85 So. 3d 21.

46 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jermeil Young La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. Antwan L. Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. William B. Turner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Ernest L. Governor La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Jaquan Battley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Trevor Marcel Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
3/13/12), State v. Crawford, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Jones La. 2019
3/13/12), State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.
Patricia Settoon v. Juan Morales; Plant Performance Services LLC; and Continental Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Darrell Derone Small La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3/13/12), -29, the supreme court noted: The Court in Batson outlined a three-step test for determining whether a peremptory challenge was based on race.
State of Louisiana v. Ralph Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3/13/12), -29, the supreme court noted: The Court in Batson outlined a three-step test for determining whether a peremptory challenge was based on race.
State v. Johnson 265 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3/13/12), , 28-29, the supreme court noted: The Court in Batson outlined a three-step test for determining whether a peremptory challenge was based on race.
State v. Hampton 261 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Larry Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry James Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry J. Broussard, Jr. La. 2018
State v. Simon 245 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Anderson -Aka- Samuel Brent Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
03/13/12), -29 (footnote omitted), which explained: In Batson [v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct.
State v. Anderson 258 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
03/13/12), , 27-29 (footnote omitted), which explained: In Batson [ v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Berry 221 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Kennon Richard AKA Kennan Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Christopher O. James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Richard 216 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. James 216 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Jones 214 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/13/12), (“[T]he state may invoke Batson where a black criminal defendant exercises peremptory challenges against white prospective jurors.”).
State of Louisiana v. Rodricus C. Crawford 218 So. 3d 13 La. 2016
3/13/12), (quoting Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 768 (1995)).
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Jerome Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3/13/12), -28 , the supreme court discussed Batson challenges: In Batson the United States Supreme Court held that the use of peremptory challenges to exclude persons from a jury based on their race violates the Equal Protection Clause.
State v. Guillory 206 So. 3d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/13/12), -28 , the supreme court discussed Batson challenges: In Batson the United States Supreme Court held that the use of peremptory challenges to exclude persons from a jury based on their race violates the Equal Protection Clause.
State of Louisiana v. Johnny Lee Harris 217 So. 3d 255 La. 2016
3/13/12), the majority found no error in those rulings: After a thorough review of the record, we find no error by the trial court.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Larry Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry James Broussard Jr. AKA Larry J. Broussard Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3/13/12), -29 (footnote omitted), as follows: In Batson, the United States Supreme Court held that the use of peremptory challenges to exclude persons from a jury based on their race violates the Equal Protection Clause.
State v. Broussard 201 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/13/12), -29 (footnote omitted), as follows: In Batson , the United States Supreme Court held that the use of peremptory challenges to exclude persons from a jury based on their race violates the Equal Protection Clause.
State of Louisiana v. Ceasar James Williams -Aka- Ceaser James Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3/13/12), -29 (footnotes omitted).
State v. Williams 181 So. 3d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Nelson, 10-1724, 10-1726, pp. 7-9 (La.3/13/12), -29 (footnotes omitted).
State v. Johnson 175 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Nelson, 2010-1724 (La.03/13/12), .
State of Louisiana v. Johnny Lee Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
This court previously explained the “reverse-Batson” process in a majority opinion: The supreme court addressed Batson challenges in State v. Nelson, 10-1724, pp. 7-9 (La.3/13/12), -29 (footnotes omitted), stating: In [Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. David E. Bender 152 So. 3d 126 La. 2014
Elie , 05-1569 at p. 5, 936 So.2d at 795 ; State v. Nelson, 10-1724, p. 16 (La.3/13/12), -33 (“In rejecting defendants’ proffered race-neutral reasons, the trial court reasoned that defendants failed to rebut the State’s prima facie case of discrimination, essentially finding the defendants’ reasons not persuasive enough.
State v. Nora 143 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 In State v. Nelson, 10-1724, 10-1726, p. 9 (La.3/13/12), -9 , the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the three-step procedure outlined in Batson that a trial court is to use when a party claims that the other party has used peremptory challenges based on race: Under Batson and its progeny, the opponent of a peremptory strike must first establish a prima facie case of purpos
State v. Fielding 130 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Nelson, 2010-1724 (La.3/13/12), .
State v. Celestine 131 So. 3d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 In State v. Nelson, 10-1724, 10-1726, p. 9 (La.3/13/12), -9 , the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the three-step procedure outlined in Batson that a trial court is to use when a party claims that the other party has used peremptory challenges based on race: Under Batson and its progeny, the opponent of a | (¡peremptory strike must first establish a prima facie case of pu
State v. Pierce 131 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
*142 The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed Batson challenges in State v. Nelson, 10-1724, pp. 7-9 (La.3/13/12), -29 (footnotes omitted), 8 stating: In [Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct.
Schexnayder v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 128 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Nelson, 10-1724, p. 11 (La.3/13/12), ; Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 359 , 111 S.Ct.
State v. Davis 121 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
In denying the challenge for cause as to Juror MH, the trial judge noted that “different jurors have different affects and her answers were, of course, very appropriate.” In State v. Nelson, 10-1724 (La.3/13/12), , the supreme court succinctly recited the law concerning the prohibition against the exercise of peremptory challenges based upon race as follows: li2In Batson, the United States Supreme Court held that the use of peremptory challenges to exclude persons from a jury based on their race
State v. Coleman 121 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
In State v. Nelson, 10-1724 (La.3/13/12), , the supreme court succinctly recited the law concerning the prohibition against the exercise of peremptory challenges based upon race: In Batson, the United States Supreme Court held that the use of peremptory challenges to exclude persons from a jury based on their race violates the Equal Protection Clause.
State of Louisiana v. Brendall Bourque La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3/13/12), -29 (footnotes omitted), stating: In [Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct.
State v. Bourque 114 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The supreme court addressed Batson challenges in State v. Nelson, 10-1724, pp. 7-9 (La.3/13/12), -29 (footnotes omitted), stating: In [Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Bill Eric Winters La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3/13/12), this court set forth the procedure to be applied in a Batson challenge situation: When a Batson challenge is asserted, the proponent bears the burden of presenting a prima facie showing of purposeful discrimination in the selection of the jury.
State v. Mason 109 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Nelson, 2010-1724 (La.3/13/12), .
State v. Winters 92 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Nelson, 10-1724 (La.3/13/12), .