Tyson v. THOMPSON HOME HEALTH
Also decided on this docket: La., June 3, 2011 63 So. 3d 1020
Tyson v. THOMPSON HOME HEALTH, 79 So. 3d 246 (La. 2011).
The holding in the court’s own words
After receiving briefing from the parties and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude the judgment below does not require the exercise of this court's supervisory authority.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
Distinguished in 2
- Northwestern Louisiana Cancer Center, LLC v. Louisiana Tax Commission La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
- Dr. Ralph Slaughter, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Louisiana … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- Kerry Fraino Versus Christopher Joseph Fraino, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- Elizabeth W. Magner and Michael W. Magner v. Michael Deas La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Pigeon Land Company, Inc. v. Shell Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
- Heirs of Lydia Bergeron, Wife of/and Sidney J. Simoneaux Land Partnership, a Limited Partnership … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Heirs of Lydia Bergeron, Wife of/and Sidney J. Simoneaux Land Partnership, a Limited Partnership … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
- Castex Development, LLC v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- Castex Development, LLC v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- Harry L. Stanley, Jr. v. Housing Authority of New Orleans, Robert E. Anderson, Gregg … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
- Cv Land, LLC v. Millers Lake, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- In the Matter of the Interdiction of Sara Malone Dunham La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Tyson v. Thompson Home Health 59 So. 3d 509
Opinion text
79 So.3d 246 (2011) Donna TYSON v. THOMPSON HOME HEALTH. No. 2011-C-0760. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 25, 2011. Rehearing Denied December 16, 2011. [*] Mahtook & LaFleur, LLC, Lafayette, Ward F. Lafleur, J. Keith Gates, Lisa M. Milazzo, K. Eric LaFleur, for Applicant. Flournoy & Doggett, Alexandria, George Arthur Flourney, for Respondent. Prior report: La.App., 59 So.3d 509 . PER CURIAM. We granted defendant's application for a writ of certiorari in this case on June 3, 2011. After receiving briefing from the parties and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude the judgment below does not require the exercise of this court's supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of June 3, 2011 as improvidently granted, and we deny defendant's writ application. VICTORY, J., dissents for reasons assigned by Justice WEIMER. WEIMER, J., dissents for reasons assigned. CLARK, J., dissents. VICTORY, J., dissents. I dissent for the reasons assigned by Justice Weimer. WEIMER, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Having granted the writ in this matter, I would resolve the issues presented. CLARK, J., dissenting. I dissent. NOTES [*] Victory, Weimer, and Clark, JJ., would grant rehearing.