Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jenkins v. Starns, 85 So. 3d 612.

43 citing documents.

Bienville Parish School Board v. Thrash Construction Services, LLC, American Testing Lab, LLC, Yeager, Watson & Associates, Inc., … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
1/24/12), Chemical Insulation Co. v. Arco Bldrs.
Kim S. Tumminello and Tim Tumminello, Individually, and on Behalf of Savanna Tumminello Versus Regel L. Bisso La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
In Re: Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Chandra Marts La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
In Re: Medical Review Panel Proceedings of Don Singleton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Dewayne Douglas Dowd, Sr., Individually And As Administrator Of The Estate Of Cora Lee Dowd (deceased) v. Helena … La. 2023
Kurt Crosby; The Tara E. Crosby Trust; The Allison Crosby Trust; The Tara E. Crosby Trust 2; The … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
1/24/12), 7 the Supreme Court summarized its holding in Teague by stating: [P]eremption commences to run in a legal malpractice case when a claimant knew or should have known of the existence of facts that would have enabled him to state a cause of action
In Re: Gabriella Posess La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Dennis Cunnikin v. Ms and Ef LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
In Re: Medical Review Panel of Mason Heath (M) La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Emanuel Flintroy, Individually and on Behalf of his Daughter, Jessica Wright v. The State of Louisiana Health Science … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
1/24/12), Coté v. Hiller, 49,623 (La.
Karen May,et Al. v. the Succession of Mayo Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
01/24/12), Corsey v. State Dep’t of Corr., ).
Bernard Gibson v. Jalou Cash's, LLC, Cash Magic Winners, and Scottsdale Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Harold Breaux, Sr. v. Terry B. Soileau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
1/24/12), the supreme court found the continuous representation rule inapplicable to actions for legal malpractice: Reaffirming this Court’s decision in Reeder, Teague, and Naghi, we find La.
Michael M. Mulkey, Sr. v. Century Indemnity Company, Petroleum Casualty Company, James Ralph Vannoy, R.H. Bretz, Ralph F. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In re Med. Review Panel of Gerard Lindquist 274 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Rushing v. Simpson 264 So. 3d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
1/24/12), ; Edwards on behalf of Edwards v. Parkerson , 51,357 (La.
Currier v. Anding 235 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/24/12), ; Naghi v. Brener, 2008-2527 (La.
Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. v. Breazeale Sachse & Wilson, LLP 212 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Gatiuso v. Nicaud 186 So. 3d 1238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2016
art. 3461; Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170 (La.1/24/12), .
Linda M. Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC 184 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Contra non valentum prevents the running of prescription when “the cause of action is not known or reasonably knowable by the plaintiff, even though this ignorance is not induced by the defendant.” Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170, p. 19 (La.1/24/12), .
Titus v. Wilson 216 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“The continuous representation rule essentially provides [that] prescription of an act of legal malpractice does not begin to run while the attorney continues to represent the client and attempts to remedy the act of malpractice.” Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170, p. 6 (La.1/24/12), .
Tracy Ray Lomont v. Michelle Myer-Bennett and Xyz Insurance Company 172 So. 3d 620 La. 2015
Prevo v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections Division of Probation & Parole 163 So. 3d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
See Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in *21 Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170 (La.01/24/12), .
Cote' v. Hiller 162 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
In Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170 (La.1/24/12), , the supreme court examined La.
Miralda v. Gonzalez 160 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
(citing Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170, p. 13 (La.1/24/12), ).
Lomont v. Myer-Bennett 164 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Ashton v. United Parcel Service 147 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Jenkins v. Starns, 2011-1170 (La.1/24/12), .
Weber v. Metropolitan Community Hospice Foundation, Inc. 131 So. 3d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Jenkins v. Starns, 2011-1170, p. 26 (La.1/24/12), .
Paul J. Allain, Architect (Apac) v. Tripple B Holdings, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Allain v. Tripple B Holding, LLC 128 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
superseded on other grounds in Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170 (La.1/24/12), .
Vagelos v. Abramson 126 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Supreme Court revisited the legal malpractice peremption statute more recently in Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170 (La.01/24/12), .
Brown v. Schonekas 122 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170, p. 13 (La.1/24/12), .
Smart v. Vazquez 119 So. 3d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
They then applied to the Supreme Court, | ¿which granted them writ and remanded the case to the trial court “for reconsideration of its ruling in light of Jenkins v. Starns, 2011-1170 (La.1/24/12), .” Smart v. Vazquez, 2011-1416, p. 1 (La.4/13/12), .
Gibsland Bank & Trust Co. v. Kitchens, Benton, Kitchens & Black (APLC) 114 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
The supreme court granted defendants’ writ application and remanded the matter to the trial court for reconsideration of its ruling in light of the supreme court’s recent decision in Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170 (La.01/24/12), .
Williams v. Library 111 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170, p. 20 (La.1/24/12), .
Barber v. Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau 97 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170 (La.1/24/12), .
Diaz v. Nicosia, Licciardi & Nunez, LLC 94 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ; Naghi v. Brener, 08-2527, p. 4 (La.6/26/09), 17 |4So.3d 919, 922, and, more recently, Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170, p. 2 (La.1/24/12), .
Gibsland Bank and Trust Company v. Kitchens Benton Kitchens & Black (Aplc) 85 So. 3d 688 La. 2012
JOHNSON, J. | TJOHNSON, J., dissents from the majority’s ruling to grant with order for the same reasons assigned in her dissent in Jenkins v. Starns, 2011-1170 (La.1/24/12), , 628-29: [T]he continuous representation rule should be applied similarly to the “continuous treatment” rule in medical malpractice cases.
Smart v. Vazquez 85 So. 3d 686 La. 2012
JOHNSON, J. |,JOHNSON, J., dissents from the majority’s ruling to grant with order for the same reasons assigned in her dissent in Jenkins v. Starns, 2011-1170 (La.1/24/12), , 628-29: [T]he continuous representation rule should be applied similarly to the “continuous treatment” rule in medical malpractice cases.
Smart v. Vazquez 85 So. 3d 689 La. 2012
JOHNSON, J. |, JOHNSON, J., dissents from the majority’s ruling to grant with order for the same reasons assigned in her dissent in Jenkins v. Starns, 2011-1170 (La.1/24/12), , 628-29: [T]he continuous representation rule should be applied similarly to the “continuous treatment” rule in medical malpractice cases.
Henderson v. SNL Distribution Services, Inc. 89 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Jenkins v. 7Starns, 11-1170, p. 19 (La.1/24/12), (citing Carter, 04-0646, pp. 11-12, 892 So.2d at 1268 ).
Cutler v. White 87 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[Pjeremption commences to run in a legal malpractice case when a claimant knew or should have known of the existence of facts that would have enabled him to state a cause of action for legal malpractice.” Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170, p. 15 (La.1/24/12), .