State v. Marino
Also decided on this docket: La., February 17, 2012 82 So. 3d 274; La., February 17, 2012 82 So. 3d 274
State v. Marino, 89 So. 3d 1176 (La. 2012).
The holding in the court’s own words
After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude the judgment below does not require the exercise of this court’s supervisory authority.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. hWe granted the State’s application for a writ of certiorari in this case on February 17, 2012. After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude the judgment below does not require the exercise of this court’s supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of February 17, 2012, as improvidently granted, and we deny the writ application. VICTORY, Justice, dissents with reasons. WEIMER, Justice, dissents with reasons.