Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLC, 171 So. 3d 851.

133 citing documents.

Eskine v. City of Gretna 240 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/15/14), , in which the Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether a construction dumpster was an open and obvious hazard or posed an unreasonable risk of harm, and found that summary judgment in favor of the defendant was appropriate.
Ronald Lee Stutes and Carroll Lynn Stutes v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Ronald Lee Stutes and Carroll Lynn Stutes v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Ronald Lee Stutes, Et Ux. v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Cox v. Baker Distrib. Co. 244 So. 3d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
10/15/14), (summary judgment for defendant was *685 proper where its dumpster on the street was obvious and apparent, thus reasonably safe to injured pedestrian whose vision was obstructed); Rodriguez v. Dolgencorp, LLC , 2014-1725 (La.
Morel v. Cheema Properties, LLC 216 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Williams v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. 217 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Hasbert v. Recreation & Park Commission for the Parish of East Baton Rouge 209 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Hazelett v. Louisiana-1 Gaming 210 So. 3d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bertaut v. Corral Gulfsouth, Inc. 209 So. 3d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Thomas v. Hunting Ingalls, Inc. 210 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
10/15/14), ; Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging Inc., 08-0528 (La.
Melancon v. Perkins Rowe Associates, LLC 208 So. 3d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Kadlec v. Louisiana Tech University 208 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Jones v. Stewart 203 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
10/15/14), ; Rodriguez v. Dolgencorp, LLC, 14-1725 (La.
Massery v. Rouse's Enterprises, L.L.C. 196 So. 3d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288, p. 7 (La.10/15/14), .
Marshall v. Jazz Casino Co. 197 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Passon v. Fields 196 So. 3d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288 (La.10/15/14), ; Milbert v. *651 Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-0022 (La.06/28/13), .
Marie M. Coburn v. Janis Dixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
10/15/14), (footnote omitted): As stated by LSA-C.C.P.
Coburn v. Dixon 190 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The supreme court expounded on the evidence required to rebut a motion for summary judgment in Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-288, p. 11 (La.10/15/14), (footnote omitted): As stated by LSA-C.C.P.
Foster v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. 193 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bufkin v. Felipe’s La., LLC, 14-288 (La.10/15/14), , The secgnd factor of the risk-utility test focuses on whether the allegedly dangerous or defective condition was obvious and apparent.
Virgil McCoy v. Town of Rosepine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Upton v. Rouse's Enterprise, LLC 186 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bufkin v. Felipe’s La., LLC, 14-288 (La.10/15/14), .
Todd v. Angel 185 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
In Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288 (La.10/15/14), , cited by the supreme court in Lockwood, supra, the court stated that a de novo standard of review is applied in considering lower court rulings on summary judgment motions.
Helwig v. H.P.B. Inc. 182 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Bufkin v. Felipe’s La., LLC, 14-0288 (La.10/15/14), ; Dauzat, 995 So.2d at 1186-1187 .
Moore v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 186 So. 3d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Cusimano v. Estate of Caillouet 182 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
5 The Louisiana Supreme Court has recently reiterated that, “[t]he burden for tort liability arising from a defect in a public sidewalk is generally with , the municipality, not the adjoining landowner, unless the abutting property owner negligently caused a defect in the sidewalk.” Bufkin v. Felipe’s La., LLC, Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, 219 La.
Reagan v. Recreation & Park Commission for the Parish of East Baton Rouge 184 So. 3d 668 La. 2015
See Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288 (La.10/15/14), .
Ludlow v. Crescent City Connection Marine Division 184 So. 3d 21 La. 2015
See Allen v. Lockwood, 14-1724 (La.2/13/15), ; Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288 (La.10/15/14), .
Doucet v. Alleman 175 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288, p. 3 (La.10/15/14), .
Doucet v. Alleman 175 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288, p. 3 (La.10/15/14), .
Doucet v. Alleman 175 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
■ Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288, p. 3 (La.10/15/14), .
Hooper v. Brown 171 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288, p. 4 (La.10/15/14), -55 , 2014 WL 5394087 .
Kadlec v. Louisiana Tech University 173 So. 3d 1165 La. 2015
The case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration of relator’s motion for summary judgment in light of Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288 (La.10/15/14), , 2014 WL 5394087 , which clarified our holding in Broussard v. State, 12-1238 (La.4/5/13), .