Jeremy George, Et Ux. v. Robbie Dugas, Et Ux.
Also decided on this docket: La., May 20, 2016 191 So. 3d 1060
Jeremy George, Et Ux. v. Robbie Dugas, Et Ux., 203 So. 3d 1043 (La. 2016).
The holding in the court’s own words
After receiving briefing from the parties, hearing oral arguments, and reviewing the record, we conclude the judgment below does not require the exercise of this Court’s supervisory authority.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of B.W. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- Jose Flores Moran v. Amtrust North America And Jacques-imo Cafe, Llc La. 2023
- In Re: L.M.M., Jr., a Minor La. 2018
- In re L.M.M. 230 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Vernon L. Rayner v. the Evangeline Bank and Trust Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Rayner v. Evangeline Bank & Trust Co. 219 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Floyd Safford v. Hammerman & Gainer International, Inc. and New Orleans Fire Department 224 So. 3d 946 La. 2017
- Larry F. Mitchell v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development 219 So. 3d 1061 La. 2017
Opinion text
PER CURIAM hWe granted plaintiffs’ application for a writ of certiorari in this case on May 20, 2016. After receiving briefing from the parties, hearing oral arguments, and reviewing the record, we conclude the judgment below does not require the exercise of this Court’s supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of May 20, 2016, as improvidently granted, and we deny plaintiffs’ writ application.