Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, No. 2018CA0421 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Aug. 5, 2019).
Opinion text
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST CIRCUIT
NO. 2018 CA 0421
FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC
VERSUS
TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC, ET AL.
Judgment Rendered: AUG 6 5 2019
On Appeal from
The 23rd Judicial District Court,
Parish of Assumption, State of Louisiana
Trial Court No. 34316
The Honorable Thomas J. Kliebert Jr., Judge Presiding
Leopold Z. Sher Attorneys for Appellant/ Defendant,
James M. Garner Texas Brine Company, LLC
Peter L. Hilbert Jr.
Jeffrey D. Kessler
New Orleans, Louisiana
Robert Ryland Percy III
Gonzales, Louisiana
Eric J. Mayer
Houston,, Texas
Travis J. Turner
Gonzales, Louisiana
Matthew J. Randazzo III Attorneys for Appellee/Third-Party
Christopher B. Bailey Defendant,
Will Montz Browning Oil Company, Inc.
Lafayette, Louisiana
BEFORE: McDONALD, CRAIN, and LANIER, JJ.
CRAIN, J.
Texas Brine Company, LLC, appeals a summary judgment dismissing
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC' s claims against Browning Oil
Company, Inc. We affirm.
This is one of several lawsuits arising out of a sinkhole in Assumption
Parish that developed on or about August 3, 2012, following the collapse of a salt
mine cavern.
Florida Gas Transmission Company sued Texas Brine, among other
defendants, alleging Texas Brine' s salt mining operations caused the collapse of
the cavern and the resulting sinkhole, which damaged two of Florida Gas' s nearby
pipelines.
Florida Gas amended its petition to include claims against Browning
Oil, which from 1991 to 2001 operated a nearby oil and gas well, sometimes
referred to as the " AH 1 well."
Browning Oil moved for summary judgment, asserting Florida Gas could
not prove the essential elements of the claims against Browning Oil. The trial
court agreed and signed a judgment on August 21, 2017, granting the motion and
dismissing Florida Gas' s claims against Browning Oil with prejudice. Texas Brine
appeals.
In a related proceeding, a different panel of this court affirmed a similar
summary judgment dismissing claims filed by Pontchartrain Natural Gas System,
K/D/ S Promix, L.L.C. and Acadian Gas Pipeline System against Browning Oil.
See Pontchartrain Natural Gas System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, 18- 0360,
2019WL2865129 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 7/ 3/ 19), So. 3d . For the reasons
provided in Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, we affirm the August 21, 2017
summary judgment. We deny Browning Oil' s motion to dismiss the appeal and
Texas Brine' s motion to stay, and grant Browning Oil' s motion to cite the
appellate record in 201.8 CA 0549. This memorandum opinion is issued in
2
accordance with Uniform Rules— Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 16. 1B. All costs of
this appeal are assessed to Texas Brine.
MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED, MOTION TO STAY DENIED;
MOTION TO CITE APPELLATE RECORD IN 2018 CA 0549 GRANTED,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
91