Jane Doe v. Kyle Poulicek
Jane Doe v. Kyle Poulicek, No. 2018CW1508 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 12, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Head v. Robichaux 265 So. 3d 813
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
JANE DOE NO. 2018 CW 1508
VERSUS
KYLE POULICEK OCT 12 2021
In Re: Jane Doe, applying for supervisory writs, Family Court
in and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 214372.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., WELCH AND CHUTZ, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. At a hearing on a protective order, the
petitioner must prove the allegations of abuse by a
preponderance of the evidence. See La. R. S. 46: 2135( B). Proof is
sufficient to constitute a preponderance of the evidence when
the entirety of the evidence, both direct and circumstantial,
shows that the fact sought to be proved is more probable than
not. Head v. Robichaux, 2018- 0366 ( La. App. lst Cir. 11/ 2/ 18),
265 So. 3d 813, 816. A trial court' s decision to issue or deny a
protective order is reversible only upon a showing of an abuse
of discretion. Id. at 817. Additionally, the trial court sitting
as a trier of fact is in the best position to evaluate the
demeanor of the witnesses, and its credibility determinations
will not be disturbed on appeal absent manifest error. Id. We
find that the trier of fact did not abuse its discretion in
dismissing the relator' s petition for protective order as the
relator did not meet her burden of proof.
VGW
JEW
WRC
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
b-ZIUM CLERKOF COURT
FOR THE COURT