In Re: Succession Of James Conway Liner, III

Supreme Court of Louisiana
March 23, 2021
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
IN RE: SUCCESSION OF JAMES CONWAY
LINER, III No.2019-C-02011
_ _ _ _
_ _
IN R
E: Laura D. Liner Centola – Applicant Other; Jeffrey Hanks Liner Applicant
Other; Applying for Rehearing, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court
Number(s) 2018-3832, Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Number(s) 53,138-CA;
_ _ _ _ _ _
March 23, 2021
Application for rehearing granted - See briefing notice.
JBM
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
PDG
03/23/2021 "See News Release 012 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

Supreme Court
STATE OF LOUISIANA
New Orleans
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L. WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J. CRAIN
SCOTT J. CRICHTON
JAMES T. GENOVESE
JAY B. MCCALLUM
JEFFERSON D. HUGHES III
PIPER D. GRIFFIN
S
ixth District
F
irst District
Second District
Third District
Fourth District
Fifth District
Seventh District
J
OHN TARLTON OLIVIER
CLERK OF COURT
400 Royal St., Suite 4200
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-8102
T
ELEPHONE (504) 310-2300
HOME PAGE http://www.lasc.org
March 23, 2021
2019-C-02011 SUCCESSION OF JAMES CONWAY LINER, III
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please be advised that the above -captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Pursuant to Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, the case may be argued on the briefs
already filed or on any additional or supplemental briefs the parties may see fit to file.
Additional / supplemental briefs on behalf of the applicant shall be filed or before April 5,
2021; Additional / supplemental briefs on behalf of the respondent shall be filed on or
before April 19, 2021.
Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be
backed with the customary "Blueback" or other flexible material. It is further provided in
Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed timely filed if mailed
on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first legal day following
the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it was timely filed.
In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be
shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or certificate from
the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such as Federal
Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing which indicates the date
thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label
from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness. Briefs
forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if
received by the clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.

W
ith kindest regards, I remain,
Ver
y truly yours,
Katie Ritti
ner Marjanovic
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
JTO: KM

ccs: All Counsel
Court of Appeal, Second Circuit: 53,138-CA