2019-K-01899 Precedential Writ granted. Processed

Clerk of Court For the Court State Of Louisiana v. Walter Perell Fisher, Jr.

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed October 20, 2020

Also decided on this docket: La., May 13, 2021

Opinion text

The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
Clerk of Court
For the Court
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
WALTER PERELL FISHER, JR.
No.2019-K-01899
_ _ _ _ _ _
IN RE: Walter Perell Fisher, Jr. - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Writ Of
Certiorari, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Number(s) 589750-
1, Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2019 KA 0669;
_ _ _ _ _ _
October 20, 2020
Writ application granted.
Crain, J., recused.
JHB
BJJ
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
Supreme Court of Louisiana
October 20, 2020
10/20/2020 "See News Release 040 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

CHIEF JUSTICE
BERNETTE J. JOHNSON
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J. CRAIN
SCOTT J. CRICHTON
JAMES T. GENOVESE
JAMES H. BODDIE, JR.
JEFFERSON D. HUGHES Ill
JOHN L. WEIMER
Seventh District
First District
Second District
Third District
�uprrmr @nurf
STATE OF LOUISIANA
, efu ®rlezms
Fourth District (pro tempore)
Fifth District
Sixth District
October 20, 2020
JOHN TARLTON OLIVIER
CLERK OF COURT
400 Royal St., Suite 4200
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-8102
TELEPHONE (504) 310-2300
HOME PAGE http://www.lasc.org
2019-K-01899 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. WALTER PERELL FISHER,
JR.
NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED October 20, 2020
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this Court's next
available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time of oral argument will be
mailed out.
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court provides that the applicant or relator,
as the case may be, must file their briefs on or before November 16, 2020; and the respondent on
or before December 4, 2020.
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should be
fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or other flexible
material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so may
subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed timely
filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first legal day following
the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it was timely filed. In all cases
where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official
United States postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service, or
bona fide commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time
of mailing which indicates the date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail
meter stamp, or label from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if received by
the clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.
With kindest regards, I remain,
TM:TM
ccs: All Counsel
Court of Appeal, First Circuit: 2019 KA 0669
S C
econd Deputy Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 2019-K-01899
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VERSUS
WALTER PERELL FISHER, JR.
On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review
Twenty-Second Judicial District Court,, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 589750- I ,
Courl of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2019 KA 0669.
And, whereas, the Courl has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the
Constitution ol'Louisiana, made and issued the following order,, to wit- "lt is
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parlies
be notified."
Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Courl of Appeal is hereby
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to
send up forthwith to this Couft, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of tl-re above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Courl of tl-re State of Louisiana, on
this 20rl'day of October, in the year of our
Lord, Two Thousand-Twenty.
John Tarlton Olivier
Clerk of Court
puty Clerk of