State Of Louisiana v. Roy D. Hopkins, Sr.
State Of Louisiana v. Roy D. Hopkins, Sr., No. 2019-KH-01291 (La. July 17, 2020).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
July 17, 2020
Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
ROY D. HOPKINS, SR.
No.2019-KH-01291
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Roy Hopkins Hopkins, Sr. - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory
Writ, Parish of East Carroll, 6th Judicial District Court Number(s) 60396, Court of
Appeal, Second Circuit, Number(s) 52996KH;
_ _ _ _ _ _
July 17, 2020
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JHB
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
07/17/2020 "See News Release 026 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
07/17/20
S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 19-KH-1291
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
RO
Y D. HOPKINS, SR.
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SIXTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST CARROLL
PE
R CURIAM:
De
nied. Applicant fails to show that the state withheld material exculpatory
evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10
L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). In addition, portions of the application are repetitive.
La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4. As to his remaining claim, applicant fails to satisfy his post-
conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post -
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.