State Of Louisiana v. Michael Leblanc

Supreme Court of Louisiana
July 24, 2020
Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
MICHAEL LEBLANC
No.2019-KH-01415
_ _ _ _
_ _
IN R
E: Michael Leblanc - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Number(s) 32299, Court of Appeal,
First Circuit, Number(s) 2019KW0557;
_ _ _ _ _ _
July 24, 2020
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
Hughes, J., would grant.
SJC
JLW
JTG
WJC
JHB
07/24/2020 "See News Release 027 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

07/24/20
S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 19-KH-1415
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
M
ICHAEL LEBLANC
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-THIRD
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ASCENSION
PE
R CURIAM:
De
nied. Appli cant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). With respect to his remaining claims, he fails to
meet his post-conviction burden of proof and/or the claims are repetitive.
La.C.Cr.P. arts. 930.2, 930.4.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.