2019-KH-01523 Precedential Writ application denied. Processed

Clerk of Court For the Court State Of Louisiana v. Tyrone Williams A/k/a Tyronne Williams

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed September 23, 2020

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
Clerk of Court
For the Court
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
TYRONE WILLIAMS A/K/A TYRONNE
WILLIAMS
No.2019-KH-01523
_ _ _ _ _ _
IN RE: Tyrone Williams - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of Orleans Criminal, Criminal District Court Number(s) 512747, Court of
Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number(s) 2019K0534;
_ _ _ _ _ _
September 23, 2020
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JHB
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
Hughes, J., concurs and assigns reasons.
S
upreme Court of Louisiana
September 23, 2020
09/23/2020 "See News Release 034 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 19-KH-1523
S
TATE EX REL. TYRONE WILLIAMS AKA
TYRONNE WILLIAMS
v.
DAR
REL VANNOY, WARDEN
ON S
UPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL
DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS
P
ER CURIAM:
D
enied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), and he fails to show a particularized need for the
requested documents. State ex rel. Bernard v. Cr.D.C. , 94-2247 (La. 4/28/95), 653
So.2d 1174
.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post- conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
09/23/20